[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190712170024.111093-10-joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:00:24 -0400
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
c0d1n61at3@...il.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
edumazet@...gle.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
keescook@...omium.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
neilb@...e.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
peterz@...radead.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
will@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT))
Subject: [PATCH v2 9/9] doc: Update documentation about list_for_each_entry_rcu
This patch updates the documentation with information about
usage of lockdep with list_for_each_entry_rcu().
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
---
Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt | 15 +++++++++++----
Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 9 ++++++++-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt
index da51d3068850..3d967df3a801 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/lockdep.txt
@@ -96,7 +96,14 @@ other flavors of rcu_dereference(). On the other hand, it is illegal
to use rcu_dereference_protected() if either the RCU-protected pointer
or the RCU-protected data that it points to can change concurrently.
-There are currently only "universal" versions of the rcu_assign_pointer()
-and RCU list-/tree-traversal primitives, which do not (yet) check for
-being in an RCU read-side critical section. In the future, separate
-versions of these primitives might be created.
+Similar to rcu_dereference_protected, The RCU list and hlist traversal
+primitives also check for whether there are called from within a reader
+section. However, an optional lockdep expression can be passed to them as
+the last argument in case they are called under other non-RCU protection.
+
+For example, the workqueue for_each_pwq() macro is implemented as follows.
+It is safe to call for_each_pwq() outside a reader section but under protection
+of wq->mutex:
+#define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node,
+ lock_is_held(&(wq->mutex).dep_map))
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
index 981651a8b65d..a08c03735963 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ rcu_dereference()
at any time, including immediately after the rcu_dereference().
And, again like rcu_assign_pointer(), rcu_dereference() is
typically used indirectly, via the _rcu list-manipulation
- primitives, such as list_for_each_entry_rcu().
+ primitives, such as list_for_each_entry_rcu() [2].
[1] The variant rcu_dereference_protected() can be used outside
of an RCU read-side critical section as long as the usage is
@@ -305,6 +305,13 @@ rcu_dereference()
a lockdep splat is emitted. See RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
and the API's code comments for more details and example usage.
+ [2] In case the list_for_each_entry_rcu() primitive is intended
+ to be used outside of an RCU reader section such as when
+ protected by a lock, then an additional lockdep expression can be
+ passed as the last argument to it so that RCU lockdep checking code
+ knows that the dereference of the list pointers are safe. If the
+ indicated protection is not provided, a lockdep splat is emitted.
+
The following diagram shows how each API communicates among the
reader, updater, and reclaimer.
--
2.22.0.510.g264f2c817a-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
