[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <HJktY5gtjje4zNNpxEQx_tBd_TRDsjz0-7kL29cMNXFvB_t6KSgOHHXFQef04GQFqCi1Ie3oZFh9DS9_m-70pJtnunZ2XS0UlGxXwK9UcYo=@protonmail.ch>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2019 14:33:04 +0000
From: Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>
To: Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] S.A.R.A. a new stacked LSM
On Saturday, July 6, 2019 10:54 AM, Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com> wrote:
> S.A.R.A. is meant to be stacked but it needs cred blobs and the procattr
> interface, so I temporarily implemented those parts in a way that won't
> be acceptable for upstream, but it works for now. I know that there
> is some ongoing work to make cred blobs and procattr stackable, as soon
> as the new interfaces will be available I'll reimplement the involved
> parts.
I thought all stacking pieces for minor LSM were merged in Linux 5.1.
Is there still something missing or is this comment out-fo-date?
Jordan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
