|
Message-Id: <20190611134831.a60c11f4b691d14d04a87e29@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 13:48:31 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Shyam Saini <shyam.saini@...rulasolutions.com> Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ts.orangefs.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, mayhs11saini@...il.com, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] include: linux: Regularise the use of FIELD_SIZEOF macro On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 01:08:36 +0530 Shyam Saini <shyam.saini@...rulasolutions.com> wrote: > Currently, there are 3 different macros, namely sizeof_field, SIZEOF_FIELD > and FIELD_SIZEOF which are used to calculate the size of a member of > structure, so to bring uniformity in entire kernel source tree lets use > FIELD_SIZEOF and replace all occurrences of other two macros with this. > > For this purpose, redefine FIELD_SIZEOF in include/linux/stddef.h and > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h and remove its defination from > include/linux/kernel.h > > In favour of FIELD_SIZEOF, this patch also deprecates other two similar > macros sizeof_field and SIZEOF_FIELD. > > For code compatibility reason, retain sizeof_field macro as a wrapper macro > to FIELD_SIZEOF As Alexey has pointed out, C structs and unions don't have fields - they have members. So this is an opportunity to switch everything to a new member_sizeof(). What do people think of that and how does this impact the patch footprint?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.