[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201906042224.42A2CCB2BE@keescook>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:25:31 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: [PATCH] lib/test_stackinit: Handle Clang auto-initialization pattern
While the gcc plugin for automatic stack variable initialization (i.e.
CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL) performs initialization with
0x00 bytes, the Clang automatic stack variable initialization (i.e.
CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL) uses various type-specific patterns that are
typically 0xAA. Therefore the stackinit selftest has been fixed to check
that bytes are no longer the test fill pattern of 0xFF (instead of looking
for bytes that have become 0x00). This retains the test coverage for the
0x00 pattern of the gcc plugin while adding coverage for the mostly 0xAA
pattern of Clang.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
lib/test_stackinit.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_stackinit.c b/lib/test_stackinit.c
index e97dc54b4fdf..2d7d257a430e 100644
--- a/lib/test_stackinit.c
+++ b/lib/test_stackinit.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
/* Exfiltration buffer. */
#define MAX_VAR_SIZE 128
-static char check_buf[MAX_VAR_SIZE];
+static u8 check_buf[MAX_VAR_SIZE];
/* Character array to trigger stack protector in all functions. */
#define VAR_BUFFER 32
@@ -106,9 +106,18 @@ static noinline __init int test_ ## name (void) \
\
/* Fill clone type with zero for per-field init. */ \
memset(&zero, 0x00, sizeof(zero)); \
+ /* Clear entire check buffer for 0xFF overlap test. */ \
+ memset(check_buf, 0x00, sizeof(check_buf)); \
/* Fill stack with 0xFF. */ \
ignored = leaf_ ##name((unsigned long)&ignored, 1, \
FETCH_ARG_ ## which(zero)); \
+ /* Verify all bytes overwritten with 0xFF. */ \
+ for (sum = 0, i = 0; i < target_size; i++) \
+ sum += (check_buf[i] != 0xFF); \
+ if (sum) { \
+ pr_err(#name ": leaf fill was not 0xFF!?\n"); \
+ return 1; \
+ } \
/* Clear entire check buffer for later bit tests. */ \
memset(check_buf, 0x00, sizeof(check_buf)); \
/* Extract stack-defined variable contents. */ \
@@ -126,9 +135,9 @@ static noinline __init int test_ ## name (void) \
return 1; \
} \
\
- /* Look for any set bits in the check region. */ \
- for (i = 0; i < sizeof(check_buf); i++) \
- sum += (check_buf[i] != 0); \
+ /* Look for any bytes still 0xFF in check region. */ \
+ for (sum = 0, i = 0; i < target_size; i++) \
+ sum += (check_buf[i] == 0xFF); \
\
if (sum == 0) \
pr_info(#name " ok\n"); \
@@ -162,13 +171,13 @@ static noinline __init int leaf_ ## name(unsigned long sp, \
* Keep this buffer around to make sure we've got a \
* stack frame of SOME kind... \
*/ \
- memset(buf, (char)(sp && 0xff), sizeof(buf)); \
+ memset(buf, (char)(sp & 0xff), sizeof(buf)); \
/* Fill variable with 0xFF. */ \
if (fill) { \
fill_start = &var; \
fill_size = sizeof(var); \
memset(fill_start, \
- (char)((sp && 0xff) | forced_mask), \
+ (char)((sp & 0xff) | forced_mask), \
fill_size); \
} \
\
--
2.17.1
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
