|
Message-Id: <20190601222738.6856-2-joel@joelfernandes.org> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 18:27:33 -0400 From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet@...gle.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, keescook@...omium.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, neilb@...e.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, oleg@...hat.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, peterz@...radead.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, rcu@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)) Subject: [RFC 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking This patch adds support for checking RCU reader sections in list traversal macros. Optionally, if the list macro is called under SRCU or other lock/mutex protection, then appropriate lockdep expressions can be passed to make the checks pass. Existing list_for_each_entry_rcu() invocations don't need to pass the optional fourth argument (cond) unless they are under some non-RCU protection and needs to make lockdep check pass. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org> --- include/linux/rculist.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 7 +++++++ kernel/rcu/update.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h index e91ec9ddcd30..b641fdd9f1a2 100644 --- a/include/linux/rculist.h +++ b/include/linux/rculist.h @@ -40,6 +40,25 @@ static inline void INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(struct list_head *list) */ #define list_next_rcu(list) (*((struct list_head __rcu **)(&(list)->next))) +/* + * Check during list traversal that we are within an RCU reader + */ +#define __list_check_rcu() \ + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held(), \ + "RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!") + +static inline void __list_check_rcu_cond(int dummy, ...) +{ + va_list ap; + int cond; + + va_start(ap, dummy); + cond = va_arg(ap, int); + va_end(ap); + + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!cond && !rcu_read_lock_any_held(), + "RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!"); +} /* * Insert a new entry between two known consecutive entries. * @@ -338,6 +357,9 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, member) : NULL; \ }) +#define SIXTH_ARG(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, ...) a6 +#define COUNT_VARGS(...) SIXTH_ARG(dummy, ## __VA_ARGS__, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0) + /** * list_for_each_entry_rcu - iterate over rcu list of given type * @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor. @@ -348,9 +370,14 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, * the _rcu list-mutation primitives such as list_add_rcu() * as long as the traversal is guarded by rcu_read_lock(). */ -#define list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, head, member) \ - for (pos = list_entry_rcu((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member); \ - &pos->member != (head); \ +#define list_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, head, member, cond...) \ + if (COUNT_VARGS(cond) != 0) { \ + __list_check_rcu_cond(0, ## cond); \ + } else { \ + __list_check_rcu(); \ + } \ + for (pos = list_entry_rcu((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member); \ + &pos->member != (head); \ pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member)) /** @@ -621,7 +648,12 @@ static inline void hlist_add_behind_rcu(struct hlist_node *n, * the _rcu list-mutation primitives such as hlist_add_head_rcu() * as long as the traversal is guarded by rcu_read_lock(). */ -#define hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, head, member) \ +#define hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(pos, head, member, cond...) \ + if (COUNT_VARGS(cond) != 0) { \ + __list_check_rcu_cond(0, ## cond); \ + } else { \ + __list_check_rcu(); \ + } \ for (pos = hlist_entry_safe (rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_first_rcu(head)),\ typeof(*(pos)), member); \ pos; \ diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index 922bb6848813..712b464ab960 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void); int rcu_read_lock_held(void); int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void); int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void); +int rcu_read_lock_any_held(void); #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */ @@ -243,6 +244,12 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void) { return !preemptible(); } + +static inline int rcu_read_lock_any_held(void) +{ + return !preemptible(); +} + #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */ #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU diff --git a/kernel/rcu/update.c b/kernel/rcu/update.c index c3bf44ba42e5..9cb30006a5e1 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/update.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c @@ -298,6 +298,32 @@ int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_read_lock_bh_held); +int rcu_read_lock_any_held(void) +{ + int lockdep_opinion = 0; + + if (!debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled()) + return 1; + if (!rcu_is_watching()) + return 0; + if (!rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online()) + return 0; + + /* Preemptible RCU flavor */ + if (lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map)) + return 1; + + /* BH flavor */ + if (in_softirq() || irqs_disabled()) + return 1; + + /* Sched flavor */ + if (debug_locks) + lockdep_opinion = lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map); + return lockdep_opinion || !preemptible(); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_read_lock_any_held); + #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */ /** -- 2.22.0.rc1.311.g5d7573a151-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.