[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0100016a5a3f6121-e7ed483e-bc29-4d75-bd0a-8e3b973529f5-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:24:24 +0000
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dvyukov@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
labbott@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: security: introduce the init_allocations=1 boot
option
Hmmmm.... Maybe its better to zero on free? That way you dont need to
initialize the allocations. You could even check if someone mucked with
the object during allocation. This is a replication of some of the
inherent debugging facilities in the allocator though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
