[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190410024103.GA104423@google.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 22:41:03 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
keescook@...omium.org, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: Make srcu_struct ptr array as read-only post
init
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 10:38:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 21:14:18 -0400
> "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
>
> > /*
> > - * Mark ro_after_init section with SHF_RO_AFTER_INIT so that
> > + * These are section names marked with SHF_RO_AFTER_INIT so that
>
> I'm curious to this much of a change. Wouldn't just making "section"
> plural also work?
>
> "Mark ro_after_init sections with ..."
Yes, I will change it to that and actually this comment change should go in
the previous patch so I'll squash it into that.
> Other than that, the two patches look fine to me.
Could I add your Reviewed-by in the respin?
thanks,
- Joel
> -- Steve
>
> > * layout_sections() can put it in the right place.
> > * Note: ro_after_init sections also have SHF_{WRITE,ALLOC} set.
> > */
> > @@ -3314,6 +3314,13 @@ static char *ro_after_init_sections[] = {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
