[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW6N40+0gGQ+LSrN64Mo4A0-ELAm0pR3gWQ0mNanyBuUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:52:09 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
"Linux/m68k" <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] lib: Introduce test_stackinit module
Hi Kees,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:08 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> Adds test for stack initialization coverage. We have several build options
> that control the level of stack variable initialization. This test lets us
> visualize which options cover which cases, and provide tests for some of
> the pathological padding conditions the compiler will sometimes fail to
> initialize.
With current upstream, using gcc Ubuntu 8.2.0-1ubuntu2~18.04, I get
on m68k:
test_stackinit: u8_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u8_zero: fill 1 wide
test_stackinit: u8_zero: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u16_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u16_zero: fill 2 wide
test_stackinit: u16_zero: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u32_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u32_zero: fill 4 wide
test_stackinit: u32_zero: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u64_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u64_zero: fill 8 wide
test_stackinit: u64_zero: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: char_array_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: char_array_zero: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: char_array_zero: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_zero: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_zero: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_zero ok
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_zero: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_zero: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_zero: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_zero: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_zero: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_dynamic_partial ok
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_partial: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_static_partial ok
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_static_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_static_partial: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_static_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_static_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_static_all FAIL (uninit bytes: 61)
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_static_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_static_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_static_all: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_static_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_dynamic_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_dynamic_all FAIL (uninit bytes: 61)
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_dynamic_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_all: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_dynamic_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_runtime_partial FAIL (uninit bytes: 127)
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_partial: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_partial: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_partial: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_partial: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_runtime_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_runtime_all FAIL (uninit bytes: 61)
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_all: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_runtime_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_all: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_all: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_runtime_all: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: u8_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u8_none: fill 1 wide
test_stackinit: u8_none: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u16_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u16_none: fill 2 wide
test_stackinit: u16_none: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u32_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u32_none: fill 4 wide
test_stackinit: u32_none: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: u64_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: u64_none: fill 8 wide
test_stackinit: u64_none: target offset by 20
test_stackinit: char_array_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: char_array_none: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: char_array_none: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: switch_1_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: switch_1_none: fill 8 wide
test_stackinit: switch_1_none: target offset by 16
test_stackinit: switch_2_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: switch_2_none: fill 8 wide
test_stackinit: switch_2_none: target offset by 16
test_stackinit: small_hole_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: small_hole_none: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: small_hole_none: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: big_hole_none FAIL (uninit bytes: 128)
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_none: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: trailing_hole_none: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: packed_none: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: packed_none: fill 16 wide
test_stackinit: packed_none: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: user: stack fill missed target!?
test_stackinit: user: fill 14 wide
test_stackinit: user: target offset by -12
test_stackinit: failures: 42
Any idea what is wrong? I find the test code a bit hard to understand...
Also, I see comments making assumptions that are not true:
struct test_small_hole {
size_t one;
char two;
/* 3 byte padding hole here. */
int three;
unsigned long four;
};
On m68k (and a few other architectures), integrals of 16-bit and larger
are aligned to a 2-byte address, so the padding may be only a single byte.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
