|
Message-Id: <20190227200132.24707-2-keescook@chromium.org> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:01:30 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>, Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/asm: Pin sensitive CR0 bits With sensitive CR4 bits pinned now, it's possible that the WP bit for CR0 might become a target as well. Following the same reasoning for the CR4 pinning, this pins CR0's WP bit (but this can be done with a static value). As before, to convince the compiler to not optimize away the check for the WP bit after the set, this marks "val" as an output from the asm() block. This protects against just jumping into the function past where the masking happens; we must check that the mask was applied after we do the set). Due to how this function can be built by the compiler (especially due to the removal of frame pointers), jumping into the middle of the function frequently doesn't require stack manipulation to construct a stack frame (there may only a retq without pops, which is sufficient for use with exploits like timer overwrites). Additionally, this avoids WARN()ing before resetting the bit, just to minimize any race conditions with leaving the bit unset. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> --- arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h index fabda1400137..1f01dc3f6c64 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h @@ -25,7 +25,28 @@ static inline unsigned long native_read_cr0(void) static inline void native_write_cr0(unsigned long val) { - asm volatile("mov %0,%%cr0": : "r" (val), "m" (__force_order)); + bool warn = false; + +again: + val |= X86_CR0_WP; + /* + * In order to have the compiler not optimize away the check + * after the cr4 write, mark "val" as being also an output ("+r") + * by this asm() block so it will perform an explicit check, as + * if it were "volatile". + */ + asm volatile("mov %0,%%cr0" : "+r" (val) : "m" (__force_order) : ); + /* + * If the MOV above was used directly as a ROP gadget we can + * notice the lack of pinned bits in "val" and start the function + * from the beginning to gain the WP bit for sure. And do it + * without first taking the exception for a WARN(). + */ + if ((val & X86_CR0_WP) != X86_CR0_WP) { + warn = true; + goto again; + } + WARN_ONCE(warn, "Attempt to unpin X86_CR0_WP, cr0 bypass attack?!\n"); } static inline unsigned long native_read_cr2(void) -- 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.