|
Message-Id: <20190221234451.17632-13-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:44:43 -0800 From: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux_dti@...oud.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, will.deacon@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, kristen@...ux.intel.com, deneen.t.dock@...el.com, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> Subject: [PATCH v3 12/20] x86/alternative: Remove the return value of text_poke_*() From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> The return value of text_poke_early() and text_poke_bp() is useless. Remove it. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h | 4 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 11 ++++------- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h index a75eed841eed..c90678fd391a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static inline void apply_paravirt(struct paravirt_patch_site *start, #define __parainstructions_end NULL #endif -extern void *text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len); +extern void text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len); /* * Clear and restore the kernel write-protection flag on the local CPU. @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ extern void *text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len); extern void *text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len); extern void *text_poke_kgdb(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len); extern int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs); -extern void *text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, void *handler); +extern void text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, void *handler); extern int after_bootmem; extern __ro_after_init struct mm_struct *poking_mm; extern __ro_after_init unsigned long poking_addr; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c index b75bfeda021e..c63707e7ed3d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static void __init_or_module add_nops(void *insns, unsigned int len) extern struct alt_instr __alt_instructions[], __alt_instructions_end[]; extern s32 __smp_locks[], __smp_locks_end[]; -void *text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len); +void text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len); /* * Are we looking at a near JMP with a 1 or 4-byte displacement. @@ -666,8 +666,8 @@ void __init alternative_instructions(void) * instructions. And on the local CPU you need to be protected again NMI or MCE * handlers seeing an inconsistent instruction while you patch. */ -void *__init_or_module text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, - size_t len) +void __init_or_module text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, + size_t len) { unsigned long flags; @@ -690,7 +690,6 @@ void *__init_or_module text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, * that causes hangs on some VIA CPUs. */ } - return addr; } __ro_after_init struct mm_struct *poking_mm; @@ -892,7 +891,7 @@ int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) * replacing opcode * - sync cores */ -void *text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, void *handler) +void text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, void *handler) { unsigned char int3 = 0xcc; @@ -934,7 +933,5 @@ void *text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, void *handler) * the writing of the new instruction. */ bp_patching_in_progress = false; - - return addr; } -- 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.