[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6a92971cd9b360ec1b0ae75887f33f67774d681a.1550088114.git.khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:01:37 -0700
From: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
To: juergh@...il.com, tycho@...ho.ws, jsteckli@...zon.de, ak@...ux.intel.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, liran.alon@...cle.com,
keescook@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, jmorris@...ei.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>, deepa.srinivasan@...cle.com,
chris.hyser@...cle.com, tyhicks@...onical.com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, jcm@...hat.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com, oao.m.martins@...cle.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, pradeep.vincent@...cle.com, john.haxby@...cle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, hch@....de,
steven.sistare@...cle.com, labbott@...hat.com, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v8 14/14] xpfo, mm: Optimize XPFO TLB flushes by batching them together
When XPFO forces a TLB flush on all cores, the performance impact is
very significant. Batching as many of these TLB updates as
possible can help lower this impact. When a userspace allocates a
page, kernel tries to get that page from the per-cpu free list.
This free list is replenished in bulk when it runs low. Free
list is being replenished for future allocation to userspace is a
good opportunity to update TLB entries in batch and reduce the
impact of multiple TLB flushes later. This patch adds new tags for
the page so a page can be marked as available for userspace
allocation and unmapped from kernel address space. All such pages
are removed from kernel address space in bulk at the time they are
added to per-cpu free list. This patch when combined with deferred
TLB flushes improves performance further. Using the same benchmark
as before of building kernel in parallel, here are the system
times on two differently sized systems:
Hardware: 96-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 CPU @ 2.10GHz, 768 GB RAM
make -j60 all
4.20 950.966s
4.20+XPFO 25073.169s 26.366x
4.20+XPFO+Deferred flush 1372.874s 1.44x
4.20+XPFO+Deferred flush+Batch update 1255.021s 1.32x
Hardware: 4-core Intel Core i5-3550 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 8G RAM
make -j4 all
4.20 607.671s
4.20+XPFO 1588.646s 2.614x
4.20+XPFO+Deferred flush 803.989s 1.32x
4.20+XPFO+Deferred flush+Batch update 795.728s 1.31x
Signed-off-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
---
arch/x86/mm/xpfo.c | 5 +++++
include/linux/page-flags.h | 5 ++++-
include/linux/xpfo.h | 8 ++++++++
mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++++
mm/xpfo.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/xpfo.c b/arch/x86/mm/xpfo.c
index d3833532bfdc..fb06bb3cb718 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/xpfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/xpfo.c
@@ -87,6 +87,11 @@ inline void set_kpte(void *kaddr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
}
+void xpfo_flush_tlb_all(void)
+{
+ xpfo_flush_tlb_kernel_range(0, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
+}
+
inline void xpfo_flush_kernel_tlb(struct page *page, int order)
{
int level;
diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
index a532063f27b5..fdf7e14cbc96 100644
--- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
+++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
@@ -406,9 +406,11 @@ PAGEFLAG(Idle, idle, PF_ANY)
PAGEFLAG(XpfoUser, xpfo_user, PF_ANY)
TESTCLEARFLAG(XpfoUser, xpfo_user, PF_ANY)
TESTSETFLAG(XpfoUser, xpfo_user, PF_ANY)
+#define __PG_XPFO_USER (1UL << PG_xpfo_user)
PAGEFLAG(XpfoUnmapped, xpfo_unmapped, PF_ANY)
TESTCLEARFLAG(XpfoUnmapped, xpfo_unmapped, PF_ANY)
TESTSETFLAG(XpfoUnmapped, xpfo_unmapped, PF_ANY)
+#define __PG_XPFO_UNMAPPED (1UL << PG_xpfo_unmapped)
#endif
/*
@@ -787,7 +789,8 @@ static inline void ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(struct page *page)
* alloc-free cycle to prevent from reusing the page.
*/
#define PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP \
- (((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1) & ~__PG_HWPOISON)
+ (((1UL << NR_PAGEFLAGS) - 1) & ~__PG_HWPOISON & ~__PG_XPFO_USER & \
+ ~__PG_XPFO_UNMAPPED)
#define PAGE_FLAGS_PRIVATE \
(1UL << PG_private | 1UL << PG_private_2)
diff --git a/include/linux/xpfo.h b/include/linux/xpfo.h
index 1dd590ff1a1f..c4f6c99e7380 100644
--- a/include/linux/xpfo.h
+++ b/include/linux/xpfo.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ void set_kpte(void *kaddr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot);
void xpfo_dma_map_unmap_area(bool map, const void *addr, size_t size,
enum dma_data_direction dir);
void xpfo_flush_kernel_tlb(struct page *page, int order);
+void xpfo_flush_tlb_all(void);
void xpfo_kmap(void *kaddr, struct page *page);
void xpfo_kunmap(void *kaddr, struct page *page);
@@ -55,6 +56,8 @@ bool xpfo_enabled(void);
phys_addr_t user_virt_to_phys(unsigned long addr);
+bool xpfo_pcp_refill(struct page *page, enum migratetype migratetype,
+ int order);
#else /* !CONFIG_XPFO */
static inline void xpfo_init_single_page(struct page *page) { }
@@ -82,6 +85,11 @@ static inline bool xpfo_enabled(void) { return false; }
static inline phys_addr_t user_virt_to_phys(unsigned long addr) { return 0; }
+static inline bool xpfo_pcp_refill(struct page *page,
+ enum migratetype migratetype, int order)
+{
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_XPFO */
#endif /* _LINUX_XPFO_H */
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index d00382b20001..5702b6fa435c 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2478,6 +2478,7 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
int migratetype)
{
int i, alloced = 0;
+ bool flush_tlb = false;
spin_lock(&zone->lock);
for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
@@ -2503,6 +2504,7 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
if (is_migrate_cma(get_pcppage_migratetype(page)))
__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES,
-(1 << order));
+ flush_tlb |= xpfo_pcp_refill(page, migratetype, order);
}
/*
@@ -2513,6 +2515,8 @@ static int rmqueue_bulk(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
*/
__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(i << order));
spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
+ if (flush_tlb)
+ xpfo_flush_tlb_all();
return alloced;
}
diff --git a/mm/xpfo.c b/mm/xpfo.c
index 5157cbebce4b..7f78d00df002 100644
--- a/mm/xpfo.c
+++ b/mm/xpfo.c
@@ -47,7 +47,8 @@ void __meminit xpfo_init_single_page(struct page *page)
void xpfo_alloc_pages(struct page *page, int order, gfp_t gfp)
{
- int i, flush_tlb = 0;
+ int i;
+ bool flush_tlb = false;
if (!static_branch_unlikely(&xpfo_inited))
return;
@@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ void xpfo_alloc_pages(struct page *page, int order, gfp_t gfp)
* was previously allocated to the kernel.
*/
if (!TestSetPageXpfoUser(page + i))
- flush_tlb = 1;
+ flush_tlb = true;
} else {
/* Tag the page as a non-user (kernel) page */
ClearPageXpfoUser(page + i);
@@ -74,6 +75,8 @@ void xpfo_alloc_pages(struct page *page, int order, gfp_t gfp)
if (flush_tlb)
xpfo_flush_kernel_tlb(page, order);
+
+ return;
}
void xpfo_free_pages(struct page *page, int order)
@@ -190,3 +193,31 @@ void xpfo_temp_unmap(const void *addr, size_t size, void **mapping,
kunmap_atomic(mapping[i]);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xpfo_temp_unmap);
+
+bool xpfo_pcp_refill(struct page *page, enum migratetype migratetype,
+ int order)
+{
+ int i;
+ bool flush_tlb = false;
+
+ if (!static_branch_unlikely(&xpfo_inited))
+ return false;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 1 << order; i++) {
+ if (migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE) {
+ /* GPF_HIGHUSER **
+ * Tag the page as a user page, mark it as unmapped
+ * in kernel space and flush the TLB if it was
+ * previously allocated to the kernel.
+ */
+ if (!TestSetPageXpfoUnmapped(page + i))
+ flush_tlb = true;
+ SetPageXpfoUser(page + i);
+ } else {
+ /* Tag the page as a non-user (kernel) page */
+ ClearPageXpfoUser(page + i);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return(flush_tlb);
+}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
