[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5b674df65263831006ea27edce2c08fd70ddd6b1.1549927666.git.igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 01:27:47 +0200
From: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com>
To:
Cc: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ahmed Soliman <ahmedsoliman@...a.vt.edu>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 10/12] __wr_after_init: rodata_test: test __wr_after_init
The write protection of the __wr_after_init data can be verified with the
same methodology used for const data.
Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: Ahmed Soliman <ahmedsoliman@...a.vt.edu>
CC: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
CC: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
mm/rodata_test.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/rodata_test.c b/mm/rodata_test.c
index e1349520b436..a669cf9f5a61 100644
--- a/mm/rodata_test.c
+++ b/mm/rodata_test.c
@@ -16,8 +16,23 @@
#define INIT_TEST_VAL 0xC3
+/*
+ * Note: __ro_after_init data is, for every practical effect, equivalent to
+ * const data, since they are even write protected at the same time; there
+ * is no need for separate testing.
+ * __wr_after_init data, otoh, is altered also after the write protection
+ * takes place and it cannot be exploitable for altering more permanent
+ * data.
+ */
+
static const int rodata_test_data = INIT_TEST_VAL;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PRMEM
+static int wr_after_init_test_data __wr_after_init = INIT_TEST_VAL;
+extern long __start_wr_after_init;
+extern long __end_wr_after_init;
+#endif
+
static bool test_data(char *data_type, const int *data,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
@@ -59,7 +74,13 @@ static bool test_data(char *data_type, const int *data,
void rodata_test(void)
{
- test_data("rodata", &rodata_test_data,
- (unsigned long)&__start_rodata,
- (unsigned long)&__end_rodata);
+ if (!test_data("rodata", &rodata_test_data,
+ (unsigned long)&__start_rodata,
+ (unsigned long)&__end_rodata))
+ return;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PRMEM
+ test_data("wr after init data", &wr_after_init_test_data,
+ (unsigned long)&__start_wr_after_init,
+ (unsigned long)&__end_wr_after_init);
+#endif
}
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
