[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190205091841.GI21801@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:18:41 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux_dti@...oud.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
will.deacon@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
kristen@...ux.intel.com, deneen.t.dock@...el.com,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/20] x86/alternative: initializing temporary mm for
patching
Just nitpicks:
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/20] x86/alternative: initializing temporary mm for patching
s/initailizing/Initialize/
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 04:34:07PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
>
> To prevent improper use of the PTEs that are used for text patching, we
> want to use a temporary mm struct. We initailize it by copying the init
Please remove the "we" from commit messages and use impartial, passive
formulations.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
