|
Message-ID: <CALCETrVcU_9cczwbfVg6E2cey5B8O9k4j+jYgp0T-CiX9HELtA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:27:22 -0800 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org> Cc: Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Jia Zhang <qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 20/27] x86: Support global stack cookie On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:29 AM Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org> wrote: > > Add an off-by-default configuration option to use a global stack cookie > instead of the default TLS. This configuration option will only be used > with PIE binaries. > > For kernel stack cookie, the compiler uses the mcmodel=kernel to switch > between the fs segment to gs segment. A PIE binary does not use > mcmodel=kernel because it can be relocated anywhere, therefore the > compiler will default to the fs segment register. This is fixed on the > latest version of gcc. I hate all these gcc-sucks-so-we-hack-it-and-change-nasty-semantics options. How about just preventing use of both stack protector and PIE unless the version of gcc in use is new enough. Also, does -mstack-protector-guard-reg not solve this? See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708. Or is there another bug? Or are you worried about gcc versions that don't have that feature yet?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.