|
Message-Id: <20190129003422.9328-18-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:34:19 -0800 From: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux_dti@...oud.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, will.deacon@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, kristen@...ux.intel.com, deneen.t.dock@...el.com, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org> Subject: [PATCH v2 17/20] bpf: Use vmalloc special flag Use new flag VM_HAS_SPECIAL_PERMS for handling freeing of special permissioned memory in vmalloc and remove places where memory was set RW before freeing which is no longer needed. Also we no longer need a bit to track if the memory is RO because it is tracked in vmalloc. Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> --- include/linux/filter.h | 16 +++------------- kernel/bpf/core.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index 9cdfab7f383c..cc9581dd9c58 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include <linux/set_memory.h> #include <linux/kallsyms.h> #include <linux/if_vlan.h> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h> #include <net/sch_generic.h> @@ -483,7 +484,6 @@ struct bpf_prog { u16 pages; /* Number of allocated pages */ u16 jited:1, /* Is our filter JIT'ed? */ jit_requested:1,/* archs need to JIT the prog */ - undo_set_mem:1, /* Passed set_memory_ro() checkpoint */ gpl_compatible:1, /* Is filter GPL compatible? */ cb_access:1, /* Is control block accessed? */ dst_needed:1, /* Do we need dst entry? */ @@ -681,26 +681,17 @@ bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(u32 off, u32 size, u32 size_default) static inline void bpf_prog_lock_ro(struct bpf_prog *fp) { + set_vm_special(fp); set_memory_ro((unsigned long)fp, fp->pages); } -static inline void bpf_prog_unlock_ro(struct bpf_prog *fp) -{ - if (fp->undo_set_mem) - set_memory_rw((unsigned long)fp, fp->pages); -} - static inline void bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr) { + set_vm_special(hdr); set_memory_ro((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages); set_memory_x((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages); } -static inline void bpf_jit_binary_unlock_ro(struct bpf_binary_header *hdr) -{ - set_memory_rw((unsigned long)hdr, hdr->pages); -} - static inline struct bpf_binary_header * bpf_jit_binary_hdr(const struct bpf_prog *fp) { @@ -735,7 +726,6 @@ void __bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp); static inline void bpf_prog_unlock_free(struct bpf_prog *fp) { - bpf_prog_unlock_ro(fp); __bpf_prog_free(fp); } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 19c49313c709..465c1c3623e8 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -804,7 +804,6 @@ void __weak bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *fp) if (fp->jited) { struct bpf_binary_header *hdr = bpf_jit_binary_hdr(fp); - bpf_jit_binary_unlock_ro(hdr); bpf_jit_binary_free(hdr); WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_prog_kallsyms_verify_off(fp)); -- 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.