[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38897e25-c07f-9da1-1671-ae31ac64c864@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:38:44 -0800
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>, juergh@...il.com, tycho@...ho.ws,
jsteckli@...zon.de, ak@...ux.intel.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
liran.alon@...cle.com, keescook@...gle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Cc: deepa.srinivasan@...cle.com, chris.hyser@...cle.com,
tyhicks@...onical.com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com,
jcm@...hat.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com,
joao.m.martins@...cle.com, jmattson@...gle.com, pradeep.vincent@...cle.com,
john.haxby@...cle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
hch@....de, steven.sistare@...cle.com, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 00/16] Add support for eXclusive Page Frame
Ownership
On 1/10/19 1:09 PM, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> I am continuing to build on the work Juerg, Tycho and Julian have done
> on XPFO. After the last round of updates, we were seeing very
> significant performance penalties when stale TLB entries were flushed
> actively after an XPFO TLB update. Benchmark for measuring performance
> is kernel build using parallel make. To get full protection from
> ret2dir attackes, we must flush stale TLB entries. Performance
> penalty from flushing stale TLB entries goes up as the number of
> cores goes up. On a desktop class machine with only 4 cores,
> enabling TLB flush for stale entries causes system time for "make
> -j4" to go up by a factor of 2.614x but on a larger machine with 96
> cores, system time with "make -j60" goes up by a factor of 26.366x!
> I have been working on reducing this performance penalty.
>
> I implemented a solution to reduce performance penalty and
> that has had large impact. When XPFO code flushes stale TLB entries,
> it does so for all CPUs on the system which may include CPUs that
> may not have any matching TLB entries or may never be scheduled to
> run the userspace task causing TLB flush. Problem is made worse by
> the fact that if number of entries being flushed exceeds
> tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling, it results in a full TLB flush on
> every CPU. A rogue process can launch a ret2dir attack only from a
> CPU that has dual mapping for its pages in physmap in its TLB. We
> can hence defer TLB flush on a CPU until a process that would have
> caused a TLB flush is scheduled on that CPU. I have added a cpumask
> to task_struct which is then used to post pending TLB flush on CPUs
> other than the one a process is running on. This cpumask is checked
> when a process migrates to a new CPU and TLB is flushed at that
> time. I measured system time for parallel make with unmodified 4.20
> kernel, 4.20 with XPFO patches before this optimization and then
> again after applying this optimization. Here are the results:
>
> Hardware: 96-core Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 CPU @ 2.10GHz, 768 GB RAM
> make -j60 all
>
> 4.20 915.183s
> 4.20+XPFO 24129.354s 26.366x
> 4.20+XPFO+Deferred flush 1216.987s 1.330xx
>
>
> Hardware: 4-core Intel Core i5-3550 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 8G RAM
> make -j4 all
>
> 4.20 607.671s
> 4.20+XPFO 1588.646s 2.614x
> 4.20+XPFO+Deferred flush 794.473s 1.307xx
>
> 30+% overhead is still very high and there is room for improvement.
> Dave Hansen had suggested batch updating TLB entries and Tycho had
> created an initial implementation but I have not been able to get
> that to work correctly. I am still working on it and I suspect we
> will see a noticeable improvement in performance with that. In the
> code I added, I post a pending full TLB flush to all other CPUs even
> when number of TLB entries being flushed on current CPU does not
> exceed tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling. There has to be a better way
> to do this. I just haven't found an efficient way to implemented
> delayed limited TLB flush on other CPUs.
>
> I am not entirely sure if switch_mm_irqs_off() is indeed the right
> place to perform the pending TLB flush for a CPU. Any feedback on
> that will be very helpful. Delaying full TLB flushes on other CPUs
> seems to help tremendously, so if there is a better way to implement
> the same thing than what I have done in patch 16, I am open to
> ideas.
>
> Performance with this patch set is good enough to use these as
> starting point for further refinement before we merge it into main
> kernel, hence RFC.
>
> Since not flushing stale TLB entries creates a false sense of
> security, I would recommend making TLB flush mandatory and eliminate
> the "xpfotlbflush" kernel parameter (patch "mm, x86: omit TLB
> flushing by default for XPFO page table modifications").
>
> What remains to be done beyond this patch series:
>
> 1. Performance improvements
> 2. Remove xpfotlbflush parameter
> 3. Re-evaluate the patch "arm64/mm: Add support for XPFO to swiotlb"
> from Juerg. I dropped it for now since swiotlb code for ARM has
> changed a lot in 4.20.
> 4. Extend the patch "xpfo, mm: Defer TLB flushes for non-current
> CPUs" to other architectures besides x86.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Juerg Haefliger (5):
> mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership (XPFO)
> swiotlb: Map the buffer if it was unmapped by XPFO
> arm64/mm: Add support for XPFO
> arm64/mm, xpfo: temporarily map dcache regions
> lkdtm: Add test for XPFO
>
> Julian Stecklina (4):
> mm, x86: omit TLB flushing by default for XPFO page table
> modifications
> xpfo, mm: remove dependency on CONFIG_PAGE_EXTENSION
> xpfo, mm: optimize spinlock usage in xpfo_kunmap
> EXPERIMENTAL: xpfo, mm: optimize spin lock usage in xpfo_kmap
>
> Khalid Aziz (2):
> xpfo, mm: Fix hang when booting with "xpfotlbflush"
> xpfo, mm: Defer TLB flushes for non-current CPUs (x86 only)
>
> Tycho Andersen (5):
> mm: add MAP_HUGETLB support to vm_mmap
> x86: always set IF before oopsing from page fault
> xpfo: add primitives for mapping underlying memory
> arm64/mm: disable section/contiguous mappings if XPFO is enabled
> mm: add a user_virt_to_phys symbol
>
> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 2 +
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/arm64/mm/flush.c | 7 +
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/mm/xpfo.c | 58 ++++
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 26 ++
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/mm/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 10 +
> arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 23 +-
> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 27 ++
> arch/x86/mm/xpfo.c | 171 ++++++++++++
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c | 3 +
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/lkdtm.h | 5 +
> drivers/misc/lkdtm/xpfo.c | 194 ++++++++++++++
> include/linux/highmem.h | 15 +-
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 +
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 8 +
> include/linux/page-flags.h | 13 +
> include/linux/sched.h | 9 +
> include/linux/xpfo.h | 90 +++++++
> include/trace/events/mmflags.h | 10 +-
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 3 +-
> mm/Makefile | 1 +
> mm/mmap.c | 19 +-
> mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +
> mm/util.c | 32 +++
> mm/xpfo.c | 247 ++++++++++++++++++
> security/Kconfig | 29 ++
> 32 files changed, 974 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/mm/xpfo.c
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/mm/xpfo.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/lkdtm/xpfo.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/xpfo.h
> create mode 100644 mm/xpfo.c
>
Also gave this a boot on my X1 Carbon and I got some lockdep splat:
[ 16.863110] ================================
[ 16.863119] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[ 16.863128] 4.20.0-xpfo+ #6 Not tainted
[ 16.863136] --------------------------------
[ 16.863145] inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
[ 16.863157] swapper/5/0 [HC1[1]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes:
[ 16.863168] 00000000301e129a (&(&page->xpfo_lock)->rlock){?.+.}, at: xpfo_do_map+0x1b/0x90
[ 16.863188] {HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[ 16.863200] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[ 16.863208] xpfo_do_map+0x1b/0x90
[ 16.863217] simple_write_begin+0xc7/0x240
[ 16.863227] generic_perform_write+0xf7/0x1c0
[ 16.863237] __generic_file_write_iter+0xfa/0x1c0
[ 16.863247] generic_file_write_iter+0xab/0x150
[ 16.863257] __vfs_write+0x139/0x1a0
[ 16.863264] vfs_write+0xba/0x1c0
[ 16.863272] ksys_write+0x52/0xc0
[ 16.863281] xwrite+0x29/0x5a
[ 16.863288] do_copy+0x2b/0xc8
[ 16.863296] write_buffer+0x2a/0x3a
[ 16.863304] unpack_to_rootfs+0x107/0x2c8
[ 16.863312] populate_rootfs+0x5d/0x10a
[ 16.863322] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2be
[ 16.863541] kernel_init_freeable+0x21b/0x2c9
[ 16.863764] kernel_init+0xa/0x109
[ 16.863988] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 16.864220] irq event stamp: 337503
[ 16.864456] hardirqs last enabled at (337502): [<ffffffff8ce000a7>] __do_softirq+0xa7/0x47c
[ 16.864715] hardirqs last disabled at (337503): [<ffffffff8c0037e8>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[ 16.864985] softirqs last enabled at (337500): [<ffffffff8c0c6d88>] irq_enter+0x68/0x70
[ 16.865263] softirqs last disabled at (337501): [<ffffffff8c0c6ea9>] irq_exit+0x119/0x120
[ 16.865546]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 16.866128] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 16.866733] CPU0
[ 16.867039] ----
[ 16.867370] lock(&(&page->xpfo_lock)->rlock);
[ 16.867693] <Interrupt>
[ 16.868019] lock(&(&page->xpfo_lock)->rlock);
[ 16.868354]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 16.869373] 1 lock held by swapper/5/0:
[ 16.869727] #0: 00000000800b2c51 (&(&ctx->completion_lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: aio_complete+0x3c/0x460
[ 16.870106]
stack backtrace:
[ 16.870868] CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Not tainted 4.20.0-xpfo+ #6
[ 16.871270] Hardware name: LENOVO 20KGS23S00/20KGS23S00, BIOS N23ET40W (1.15 ) 04/13/2018
[ 16.871686] Call Trace:
[ 16.872106] <IRQ>
[ 16.872531] dump_stack+0x85/0xc0
[ 16.872962] print_usage_bug.cold.60+0x1a8/0x1e2
[ 16.873407] ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x40/0x40
[ 16.873856] mark_lock+0x502/0x600
[ 16.874308] ? check_usage_backwards+0x120/0x120
[ 16.874769] __lock_acquire+0x6e2/0x1650
[ 16.875236] ? find_held_lock+0x34/0xa0
[ 16.875710] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xb0
[ 16.876185] lock_acquire+0x9e/0x180
[ 16.876668] ? xpfo_do_map+0x1b/0x90
[ 16.877154] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[ 16.877649] ? xpfo_do_map+0x1b/0x90
[ 16.878144] xpfo_do_map+0x1b/0x90
[ 16.878647] aio_complete+0xb2/0x460
[ 16.879154] blkdev_bio_end_io+0x71/0x150
[ 16.879665] blk_update_request+0xd7/0x2e0
[ 16.880170] blk_mq_end_request+0x1a/0x100
[ 16.880669] blk_mq_complete_request+0x98/0x120
[ 16.881175] nvme_irq+0x192/0x210 [nvme]
[ 16.881675] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x46/0x2a0
[ 16.882174] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x30/0x80
[ 16.882670] handle_irq_event+0x34/0x51
[ 16.883252] handle_edge_irq+0x7b/0x190
[ 16.883772] handle_irq+0xbf/0x100
[ 16.883774] do_IRQ+0x5f/0x120
[ 16.883776] common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
[ 16.885469] RIP: 0010:__do_softirq+0xae/0x47c
[ 16.885470] Code: 0c 00 00 01 c7 44 24 24 0a 00 00 00 44 89 7c 24 04 48 c7 c0 c0 1e 1e 00 65 66 c7 00 00 00 e8 69 3d 3e ff fb 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 <48> c7 44 24 08 80 51 60 8d b8 ff ff ff ff 0f bc 44 24 04 83 c0 01
[ 16.885471] RSP: 0018:ffff8bde5e003f68 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffdd
[ 16.887291] RAX: ffff8bde5b303740 RBX: ffff8bde5b303740 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 16.887291] RDX: ffff8bde5b303740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8bde5b303740
[ 16.887292] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 16.887293] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[ 16.887294] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000202
[ 16.887296] ? common_interrupt+0xa/0xf
[ 16.890885] ? __do_softirq+0xa7/0x47c
[ 16.890887] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x12e/0x220
[ 16.890889] irq_exit+0x119/0x120
[ 16.890920] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa2/0x230
[ 16.890921] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
[ 16.890922] </IRQ>
[ 16.890955] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xbe/0x350
[ 16.890956] Code: 80 7c 24 0b 00 74 17 9c 58 0f 1f 44 00 00 f6 c4 02 0f 85 6d 02 00 00 31 ff e8 8e 61 91 ff e8 19 77 98 ff fb 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 <85> ed 0f 88 36 02 00 00 48 b8 ff ff ff ff f3 01 00 00 48 2b 1c 24
[ 16.890957] RSP: 0018:ffffa91a41997ea0 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
[ 16.891025] RAX: ffff8bde5b303740 RBX: 00000003ed1dca4d RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 16.891026] RDX: ffff8bde5b303740 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8bde5b303740
[ 16.891027] RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 16.891028] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff8d7f8898
[ 16.891028] R13: ffffc91a3f800a00 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 16.891032] do_idle+0x23e/0x280
[ 16.891119] cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20
[ 16.891122] start_secondary+0x1b3/0x200
[ 16.891124] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
This was 4.20 + this series. config was based on what Fedora has.
Thanks,
Laura
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
