[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154472839566208@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:13:15 +0100
From: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: 151727416953.33451.10508284228526170604.stgit@...llia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com,ak@...ux.intel.com,alan@...ux.intel.com,ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,dan.j.williams@...el.com,gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,keescook@...omium.org,kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,tglx@...utronix.de,torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: <stable-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-uaccess-use-__uaccess_begin_nospec-and-uaccess_try_nospec.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@...r.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Dec 13 20:11:30 CET 2018
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:02:49 -0800
Subject: x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
commit 304ec1b050310548db33063e567123fae8fd0301 upstream.
Quoting Linus:
I do think that it would be a good idea to very expressly document
the fact that it's not that the user access itself is unsafe. I do
agree that things like "get_user()" want to be protected, but not
because of any direct bugs or problems with get_user() and friends,
but simply because get_user() is an excellent source of a pointer
that is obviously controlled from a potentially attacking user
space. So it's a prime candidate for then finding _subsequent_
accesses that can then be used to perturb the cache.
__uaccess_begin_nospec() covers __get_user() and copy_from_iter() where the
limit check is far away from the user pointer de-reference. In those cases
a barrier_nospec() prevents speculation with a potential pointer to
privileged memory. uaccess_try_nospec covers get_user_try.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: alan@...ux.intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727416953.33451.10508284228526170604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
[bwh: Backported to 4.4:
- Convert several more functions to use __uaccess_begin_nospec(), that
are just wrappers in mainline
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 6 +++---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c | 10 +++++-----
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ do { \
({ \
int __gu_err; \
unsigned long __gu_val; \
- __uaccess_begin(); \
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec(); \
__get_user_size(__gu_val, (ptr), (size), __gu_err, -EFAULT); \
__uaccess_end(); \
(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ struct __large_struct { unsigned long bu
* get_user_ex(...);
* } get_user_catch(err)
*/
-#define get_user_try uaccess_try
+#define get_user_try uaccess_try_nospec
#define get_user_catch(err) uaccess_catch(err)
#define get_user_ex(x, ptr) do { \
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ extern void __cmpxchg_wrong_size(void)
__typeof__(ptr) __uval = (uval); \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __old = (old); \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __new = (new); \
- __uaccess_begin(); \
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec(); \
switch (size) { \
case 1: \
{ \
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
@@ -48,25 +48,25 @@ __copy_to_user_inatomic(void __user *to,
switch (n) {
case 1:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__put_user_size(*(u8 *)from, (u8 __user *)to,
1, ret, 1);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__put_user_size(*(u16 *)from, (u16 __user *)to,
2, ret, 2);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__put_user_size(*(u32 *)from, (u32 __user *)to,
4, ret, 4);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 8:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__put_user_size(*(u64 *)from, (u64 __user *)to,
8, ret, 8);
__uaccess_end();
@@ -111,17 +111,17 @@ __copy_from_user_inatomic(void *to, cons
switch (n) {
case 1:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
@@ -162,17 +162,17 @@ __copy_from_user(void *to, const void __
switch (n) {
case 1:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
@@ -190,17 +190,17 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __c
switch (n) {
case 1:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -57,31 +57,31 @@ int __copy_from_user_nocheck(void *dst,
return copy_user_generic(dst, (__force void *)src, size);
switch (size) {
case 1:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u8 *)dst, (u8 __user *)src,
ret, "b", "b", "=q", 1);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u16 *)dst, (u16 __user *)src,
ret, "w", "w", "=r", 2);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u32 *)dst, (u32 __user *)src,
ret, "l", "k", "=r", 4);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 8:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src,
ret, "q", "", "=r", 8);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 10:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src,
ret, "q", "", "=r", 10);
if (likely(!ret))
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int __copy_from_user_nocheck(void *dst,
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 16:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src,
ret, "q", "", "=r", 16);
if (likely(!ret))
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, con
switch (size) {
case 1: {
u8 tmp;
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(tmp, (u8 __user *)src,
ret, "b", "b", "=q", 1);
if (likely(!ret))
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, con
}
case 2: {
u16 tmp;
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(tmp, (u16 __user *)src,
ret, "w", "w", "=r", 2);
if (likely(!ret))
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, con
case 4: {
u32 tmp;
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(tmp, (u32 __user *)src,
ret, "l", "k", "=r", 4);
if (likely(!ret))
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, con
}
case 8: {
u64 tmp;
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(tmp, (u64 __user *)src,
ret, "q", "", "=r", 8);
if (likely(!ret))
--- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ do { \
unsigned long __copy_to_user_ll(void __user *to, const void *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n))
__copy_user(to, from, n);
else
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_to_user_ll);
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n))
__copy_user_zeroing(to, from, n);
else
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll);
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nozero(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n))
__copy_user(to, from, n);
else
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nozero
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocache(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
if (n > 64 && cpu_has_xmm2)
n = __copy_user_zeroing_intel_nocache(to, from, n);
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nocach
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocache_nozero(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
if (n > 64 && cpu_has_xmm2)
n = __copy_user_intel_nocache(to, from, n);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dan.j.williams@...el.com are
queue-4.4/x86-introduce-__uaccess_begin_nospec-and-uaccess_try_nospec.patch
queue-4.4/kvm-vmx-emulate-msr_ia32_arch_capabilities.patch
queue-4.4/x86-usercopy-replace-open-coded-stac-clac-with-__uaccess_-begin-end.patch
queue-4.4/x86-uaccess-use-__uaccess_begin_nospec-and-uaccess_try_nospec.patch
queue-4.4/kvm-vmx-allow-direct-access-to-msr_ia32_spec_ctrl.patch
queue-4.4/kvm-x86-add-ibpb-support.patch
queue-4.4/kvm-svm-allow-direct-access-to-msr_ia32_spec_ctrl.patch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
