[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrU+skBS0r6WtkwwMZJvb3s2vWB-JmDeZtVWV8pOkxKojQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:40:53 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, jeyu@...nel.org,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, "Dock, Deneen T" <deneen.t.dock@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/modules: Make x86 allocs to flush when free
> On Nov 27, 2018, at 4:07 PM, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Change the module allocations to flush before freeing the pages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/module.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/module.c b/arch/x86/kernel/module.c
> index b052e883dd8c..1694daf256b3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/module.c
> @@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ void *module_alloc(unsigned long size)
> p = __vmalloc_node_range(size, MODULE_ALIGN,
> MODULES_VADDR + get_module_load_offset(),
> MODULES_END, GFP_KERNEL,
> - PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, 0, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> - __builtin_return_address(0));
> + PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, VM_IMMEDIATE_UNMAP,
> + NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0));
Hmm. How awful is the resulting performance for heavy eBPF users? I’m
wondering if the JIT will need some kind of cache to reuse
allocations.
> if (p && (kasan_module_alloc(p, size) < 0)) {
> vfree(p);
> return NULL;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
