[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181123170401.GA25204@openwall.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 18:04:01 +0100
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com>
Cc: "Stecklina, Julian" <jsteckli@...zon.de>,
"tycho@...ho.ws" <tycho@...ho.ws>,
"liran.alon@...cle.com" <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
"jwadams@...gle.com" <jwadams@...gle.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Process-local memory allocations
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 06:24:08PM +0200, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> On 22/11/2018 18:40, Stecklina, Julian wrote:
> >On Wed, 2018-11-21 at 10:48 -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> >>>Where is the full set of patches?
> >>>I'm sorry, I searched both KVM and LKML archives, but I couldn't find it.
> >>
> >>It looks like they were only sent to kernel hardening, but not sent to
> >>the archives? I only see our replies here:
> >>
> >>https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/
> >>
> >>Julian, perhaps you can re-send with a CC to lkml as well?
> >
> >Will do. I messed up the threading, due to git send-email being hostile to
> >me.
> >Sorry for the confusion.
>
> If you are not subscribed to the hardening ml, it will neither archive,
> nor forward to subscribers your emails.
No. There's no requirement to be subscribed to kernel-hardening in
order to be able to post, nor for messages to be archived.
> This very mail you wrote is not archived either.
Julian's message in fact did not appear on kernel-hardening, and the
reason is that Amazon's mail servers - for reasons unknown to me (and to
an Amazoner with whom I tried discussing it before) sometimes(?!) add
the "Precedence: junk" header on messages. ezmlm-idx drops such
messages by default (and this behavior is documented). I'm not eager to
patch this out. ezmlm-idx also drops messages with "Precedence: bulk",
and it sets that header on messages it sends to list subscribers, which
helps against loops. Another reason is to avoid vacation auto-replies,
which I think can use either header. It'd be weird to continue dropping
"bulk", yet start accepting "junk", wouldn't it? But if this is
unfixable on Amazon's end, I'll have to.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
