Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181111205351.1874bb1e@vmware.local.home>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 20:53:51 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
 Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andy
 Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Borislav
 Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Dave Hansen
 <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Jan
 Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Masahiro Yamada
 <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
 x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] stackleak: Disable ftrace for stackleak.c

On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 13:19:45 +0300
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> wrote:

> On 11.11.2018 2:30, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 01:05:30 +0300
> > Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> The stackleak_erase() function is called on the trampoline stack at the
> >> end of syscall. This stack is not big enough for ftrace operations,
> >> e.g. it can be overflowed if we enable kprobe_events for stackleak_erase().  
> > 
> > Is the issue with kprobes or with function tracing? Because this stops
> > function tracing which I only want disabled if function tracing itself
> > is an issue, not for other things that may use the function tracing
> > infrastructure.  
> 
> Hello Steven,
> 
> I believe that stackleak erasing is not compatible with function tracing itself.
> That's what the kernel testing robot has hit:
> https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2018/11/09/1
> 
> I used kprobe_events just to reproduce the problem:
> https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2018/11/09/4

Have you tried adding a "notrace" to stackleak_erase()?

Not tracing the entire file is a bit of overkill. There's no reason
ftrace can't trace stack_erasing_sysctl() or perhaps even
stackleak_track_stack() as that may be very interesting to trace.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.