|
Message-ID: <35bac572-14cc-d7c3-f788-1120c7431fb4@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:52:08 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> To: Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, dave.hansen@...el.com, deneen.t.dock@...el.com, kristen@...ux.intel.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] sidechannel: Linux Security Module for sidechannel Hi: On 11/5/18 11:05 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote: > diff --git a/security/sidechannel/Kconfig b/security/sidechannel/Kconfig > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..653033027415 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/security/sidechannel/Kconfig > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > +config SECURITY_SIDECHANNEL > + bool "Sidechannel attack safety extra checks" > + depends on SECURITY > + default n Please drop the "default n" since it is already the default value. > + help > + Look for a variety of cases where a side-channel attack > + could potentially be exploited. Instruct the switching > + code to use the indirect_branch_prediction_barrier in > + cases where the passed task and the current task may be > + at risk. > + > + If you are unsure how to answer this question, answer N. Use tab + 2 spaces to indent the line above. > + thanx. -- ~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.