[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez2W8HeJcuPwA25vSqTco3B=CRzycSA0=--pG=7jWi3pPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:26:37 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seq_buf: Make seq_buf_puts() NULL terminate the buffer
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 2:10 PM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> Currently seq_buf_puts() will happily create a non NULL terminated
> string for you in the buffer. This is particularly dangerous if the
> buffer is on the stack.
>
> For example:
>
> char buf[8];
> char secret = "secret";
> struct seq_buf s;
>
> seq_buf_init(&s, buf, sizeof(buf));
> seq_buf_puts(&s, "foo");
> printk("Message is %s\n", buf);
>
> Can result in:
>
> Message is fooªªªªªsecret
>
> We could require all users to memset() their buffer to NULL before
> use. But that seems likely to be forgotten and lead to bugs.
>
> Instead we can change seq_buf_puts() to always leave the buffer in a
> NULL terminated state.
>
> The only downside is that this makes the buffer 1 character smaller
> for seq_buf_puts(), but that seems like a good trade off.
After this, you can also simplify rdt_last_cmd_status_show(), right?
> ---
> lib/seq_buf.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> I recently merged a patch which actually hit this behaviour. I worked
> around it by using seq_buf_printf(), but it would be good to fix the
> problem at the source.
>
> diff --git a/lib/seq_buf.c b/lib/seq_buf.c
> index 11f2ae0f9099..b1570204cde3 100644
> --- a/lib/seq_buf.c
> +++ b/lib/seq_buf.c
> @@ -144,9 +144,13 @@ int seq_buf_puts(struct seq_buf *s, const char *str)
>
> WARN_ON(s->size == 0);
>
> + /* Add 1 to len for the trailing NULL which must be there */
Nit: In the comments, I would prefer either "null byte" or "NUL"
instead of "NULL" when talking about something that is not a pointer.
> + len += 1;
It looks like you're using an "unsigned int" for the length, meaning
that this can in theory (e.g. when operating on a string from a big
vmalloc buffer) overflow. You should be using size_t here.
> if (seq_buf_can_fit(s, len)) {
> memcpy(s->buffer + s->len, str, len);
> - s->len += len;
> + /* Don't count the trailing NULL against the capacity */
> + s->len += len - 1;
> return 0;
> }
> seq_buf_set_overflow(s);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
