kernel-hardening - Re: [RFC 0/5] perf: Per PMU access controls (paranoid setting)

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d7ae4c13-262c-a5fb-7e00-cda4b05772ad@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:27:07 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 tursulin@...ulin.net, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin"
 <hpa@...or.com>, acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
 jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
 Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] perf: Per PMU access controls (paranoid setting)

Hello Jann and Kees,

On 29.09.2018 1:02, Jann Horn wrote:
<SNIP>
> Ah, I guess the answer is "0", since you want to see data about what
> other users are doing.
> 
> Does the i915 PMU expose sampling events, counting events, or both?
> The thing about sampling events is that they AFAIK always let the user
> pick arbitrary data to collect - like register contents, or userspace
> stack memory -, and independent of the performance counter being
> monitored, this kind of access should not be permitted to other
> contexts. (But it might be that I misunderstand how perf works - I'm
> not super familiar with its API.)
> 

Currently *core* paranoid >= 1 (per-process mode) prevents simultaneous 
sampling on CPU events (perf record) and reading of uncore HW counters 
(perf stat -I), because uncore counters count system wide and that is 
allowed only when *core* paranoid <= 0.

Uncore counts collected simultaneously with CPU event samples can be 
correlated using timestamps taken from some common system clock e.g. 
CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW.

Could it be secure enough to still allow reading of system wide uncore 
HW counters when sampling of CPU events is limited to specific processes 
by *core* paranoid >= 1?

Thanks,
Alexey

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.