Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ca7144a-2659-3877-b208-ce043d1393dc@linux.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:38:08 +0300
From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, will.deacon@....com,
 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 james.morse@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Clear the stack

On 03.07.2018 18:03, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 01:14:41PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 11:48:05AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2018 06:02 AM, Alexander Popov wrote:
>>>> Could you rename the macro to STACKLEAK_ERASE for similarity with x86?
>>>
>>> Mark Rutland had previously asked for this to be lowercase.
>>> I really don't care one way or the other so I'll defer to
>>> someone else to have the final word.
>>
>> Will, Catalin, could you chime in either way?
>>
>> I'd previously asked for lower-case for consistency with our other
>> assembly macros.
> 
> I'd keep it lowercase as the other arm64 macros in this file.

Ok, thanks, I'm fine with it.

Best regards,
Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.