|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jL8XDYE+B=a_TBM2K8F-c3f4Jz6zcm3ggacbPNN2wCtpg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 11:43:40 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] add param that allows bootline control of hardened usercopy On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Christoph von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com> wrote: > The last issue I'm chasing is build failures on ARCH=m68k. The error is > atomic_read and friends needed by the jump label code not being found. > The config has CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP=y, so the jump label calls I added > will only be made #ifndef CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP. Do you think that's > worth a mention in the blurb that's added to > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt? Uhm, that's weird -- I think the configs on m68k need fixing then? I don't want to have to sprinkle that ifdef in generic code. How are other users of static keys and jump labels dealing with m68k weirdness? -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.