|
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-KA0Yog7mxfPkF7aNkJsTr=V6+R9+tbKLw0xMb4mSmWQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:00:57 +0200 From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> Cc: YaoJun <yaojun8558363@...il.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: mark tramp_pg_dir read-only On 19 June 2018 at 17:55, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 05:51:46PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> On 19 June 2018 at 17:50, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 05:40:26PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> On 19 June 2018 at 17:37, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 05:29:03PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> >> On 19 June 2018 at 17:28, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote: >> >> >> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 05:23:41PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> >> >> On 19 June 2018 at 17:20, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:53:20AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On 30 May 2018 at 11:14, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:48:06PM +0800, YaoJun wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> >> >> >> >> >> index 2dbb2c9f1ec1..ac4b22c7e435 100644 >> >> >> >> >> >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> >> >> >> >> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> >> >> >> >> >> @@ -551,6 +551,10 @@ static int __init map_entry_trampoline(void) >> >> >> >> >> >> __create_pgd_mapping(tramp_pg_dir, pa_start, TRAMP_VALIAS, PAGE_SIZE, >> >> >> >> >> >> prot, pgd_pgtable_alloc, 0); >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> + update_mapping_prot(__pa_symbol(tramp_pg_dir), >> >> >> >> >> >> + (unsigned long)tramp_pg_dir, >> >> >> >> >> >> + PGD_SIZE, PAGE_KERNEL_RO); >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > Hmm, I like the idea but is there a risk that the page table has been mapped >> >> >> >> >> > as part of a block entry, which we can't safely split at this point (i.e. >> >> >> >> >> > we'll run into one of the BUG_ONs in the mapping code)? >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We'd need to create a separate segment for it initially so the mapping >> >> >> >> >> is already at the right granularity. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Why do you think that's the case? I can't see anything that guarantees this >> >> >> >> > for the page table itself. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> We'd need to pass NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS to map_kernel_segment(), >> >> >> >> obviously, but that shouldn't hurt since that segment is relatively >> >> >> >> tiny anyway. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Ah right, with NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS, I agree that we're good. >> >> >> > Ideally, we'd move {idmap,swapper,tramp}_pg_dir into .rodata... >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> idmap and tramp yes, but swapper needs to be modifiable at runtime, no? >> >> > >> >> > Right, but couldn't we swizzle the permissions in e.g. set_pmd? We could >> >> > even predicate that on a sanity check of the prot. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Swizzle the permissions of the entire .rodata segment? That sounds >> >> doable, but there is a whole class of data that belongs in this >> >> category, and I think PaX/grsecurity had an API for that (but I don't >> >> think anyone is upstreaming that yet). So let's not reinvent that >> >> wheel for swapper_pg_dir only. >> > >> > I wasn't thinking of the whole .rodata segment -- just the page containing >> > the entry being modified, but ok. >> >> That means we will need to map .rodata down to pages as well, or at >> least avoid contiguous mappings. > > Doesn't it already avoid those? > You are right, it does.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.