|
Message-Id: <1523253969-31699-3-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:06:08 +0400 From: kpark3469@...il.com To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, keescook@...omium.org, will.deacon@....com, mark.rutland@....com, james.morse@....com, panand@...hat.com, keun-o.park@...kmatter.ae, psodagud@...eaurora.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: usercopy: implement arch_within_stack_frames From: James Morse <james.morse@....com> This implements arch_within_stack_frames() for arm64 that should validate if a given object is contained by a kernel stack frame. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com> Reviewed-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@...kmatter.ae> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 177be0d..72d0747 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ config ARM64 select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS select HAVE_KPROBES select HAVE_KRETPROBES + select HAVE_ARCH_WITHIN_STACK_FRAMES select IOMMU_DMA if IOMMU_SUPPORT select IRQ_DOMAIN select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index 33c4028..9918698 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ #include <asm/irq.h> #include <asm/stack_pointer.h> +#define FAKE_FRAME(frame, my_func) do { \ + frame.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0); \ + frame.pc = (unsigned long)my_func; \ +} while (0) + /* * AArch64 PCS assigns the frame pointer to x29. * @@ -99,6 +104,77 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame, } } +struct check_frame_arg { + unsigned long obj_start; + unsigned long obj_end; + unsigned long frame_start; + int discard_frames; + int err; +}; + +static int check_frame(struct stackframe *frame, void *d) +{ + struct check_frame_arg *arg = d; + unsigned long frame_end = frame->fp; + + /* object overlaps multiple frames */ + if (arg->obj_start < frame->fp && frame->fp < arg->obj_end) { + arg->err = BAD_STACK; + return 1; + } + + /* + * Discard frames and check object is in a frame written early + * enough. + */ + if (arg->discard_frames) + arg->discard_frames--; + else if ((arg->frame_start <= arg->obj_start && + arg->obj_start < frame_end) && + (arg->frame_start < arg->obj_end && arg->obj_end <= frame_end)) + return 1; + + /* object exists in a previous frame */ + if (arg->obj_end < arg->frame_start) { + arg->err = BAD_STACK; + return 1; + } + + arg->frame_start = frame_end + 0x10; + + return 0; +} + +/* Check obj doesn't overlap a stack frame record */ +int arch_within_stack_frames(const void *stack, + const void *stack_end, + const void *obj, unsigned long obj_len) +{ + struct stackframe frame; + struct check_frame_arg arg; + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)) + return NOT_STACK; + + arg.err = GOOD_FRAME; + arg.obj_start = (unsigned long)obj; + arg.obj_end = arg.obj_start + obj_len; + + FAKE_FRAME(frame, arch_within_stack_frames); + arg.frame_start = frame.fp; + + /* + * Skip 4 non-inlined frames: <fake frame>, + * arch_within_stack_frames(), check_stack_object() and + * __check_object_size(). + */ + arg.discard_frames = 4; + + walk_stackframe(current, &frame, check_frame, &arg); + + return arg.err; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE struct stack_trace_data { struct stack_trace *trace; -- 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.