[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180312202644.5594421e@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:26:44 +0100
From: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, "hare@...e.com" <hare@...e.com>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com"
<jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] device_handler: remove VLAs
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:41:26 +0000, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 14:14 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > The two patches I sent were supposed to be alternative solutions; see
> > https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=152063671005295&w=2 for the
> > introduction (I seem to have messed up the headers, so the mails didn’t
> > end up threaded properly).
>
> The two patches arrived in my inbox several minutes before the cover
> letter. In the e-mail header of the cover letter I found the following:
>
> X-Greylist: delayed 1810 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri,
> 09 Mar 2018 18:05:08 EST
>
> Does this mean that the delay happened due to vger server's anti-spam
> algorithm?
That’s right, the greylisting part of its anti-spam measures.
Regards,
Stephen
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
