|
Message-ID: <lsq.1520823972.943057352@decadent.org.uk> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 03:06:12 +0000 From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, alan@...ux.intel.com, "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@....com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, "Kees Cook" <keescook@...omium.org>, "Al Viro" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> Subject: [PATCH 3.16 74/76] x86/usercopy: Replace open coded stac/clac with __uaccess_{begin, end} 3.16.56-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> commit b5c4ae4f35325d520b230bab6eb3310613b72ac1 upstream. In preparation for converting some __uaccess_begin() instances to __uacess_begin_nospec(), make sure all 'from user' uaccess paths are using the _begin(), _end() helpers rather than open-coded stac() and clac(). No functional changes. Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org Cc: alan@...ux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727416438.33451.17309465232057176966.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com [bwh: Backported to 3.16: - Convert several more functions to use __uaccess_begin_nospec(), that are just wrappers in mainline - Adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> --- arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c +++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c @@ -570,12 +570,12 @@ do { \ unsigned long __copy_to_user_ll(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) { - stac(); + __uaccess_begin(); if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n)) __copy_user(to, from, n); else n = __copy_user_intel(to, from, n); - clac(); + __uaccess_end(); return n; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_to_user_ll); @@ -583,12 +583,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_to_user_ll); unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n) { - stac(); + __uaccess_begin(); if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n)) __copy_user_zeroing(to, from, n); else n = __copy_user_zeroing_intel(to, from, n); - clac(); + __uaccess_end(); return n; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll); @@ -596,13 +596,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll); unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nozero(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n) { - stac(); + __uaccess_begin(); if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n)) __copy_user(to, from, n); else n = __copy_user_intel((void __user *)to, (const void *)from, n); - clac(); + __uaccess_end(); return n; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nozero); @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nozero unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocache(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n) { - stac(); + __uaccess_begin(); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY if (n > 64 && cpu_has_xmm2) n = __copy_user_zeroing_intel_nocache(to, from, n); @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocach #else __copy_user_zeroing(to, from, n); #endif - clac(); + __uaccess_end(); return n; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nocache); @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nocach unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocache_nozero(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n) { - stac(); + __uaccess_begin(); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY if (n > 64 && cpu_has_xmm2) n = __copy_user_intel_nocache(to, from, n); @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocach #else __copy_user(to, from, n); #endif - clac(); + __uaccess_end(); return n; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nocache_nozero);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.