kernel-hardening - Re: [PATCH][RFC] rslib: Remove VLAs by setting upper bound on nroots

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1803092356210.1570@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 23:57:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
    Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>, 
    Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] rslib: Remove VLAs by setting upper bound on
 nroots

On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:49 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> Maybe I should just go with 24 as the max, and if we have a case where
> we need more, address it then?

Works for me.

Thanks,

	tglx

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.