|
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxkzxhGaK=sp2CqM1YFEE=fL33wC1TR4KKqsRqPGto6yA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:16:51 -0800 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>, "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>, Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>, Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v9 4/7] x86/entry: Erase kernel stack in syscall_trace_enter() On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote: > > The compiler usually does a pretty good job of detecting which scalar > variables are never initialized by regular assignment. Sure, but "usually" is not really the same as always. Sometimes scalar types are initialized by passing a reference to them too. > We could easily extend this to scalar and array types, but we'd first > need to see what the performance impact is, because I don't think it > will be negligible. For scalar types, I suspect it will be entirely unnoticeable, because they are not only small, but it's rare that this kind of "initialize by passing a reference" happens in the first place. For arrays, I agree. We very well may have arrays that we really want to do magic things about. But even then I'd rather have a "don't initialize this" flag for critical stuff that really *does* get initialized some other way. Then we can grep for those things and be more careful. If somebody has big arrays on the stack, that's often a problem anyway. It may be common in non-kernel code, but kernel code is very special. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.