|
Message-ID: <20180306141317.GC13722@bombadil.infradead.org> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 06:13:17 -0800 From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>, david@...morbit.com, keescook@...omium.org, mhocko@...nel.org, labbott@...hat.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] genalloc: track beginning of allocations On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 02:19:03PM +0100, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > +/** > > + * gen_pool_create() - create a new special memory pool > > + * @min_alloc_order: log base 2 of number of bytes each bitmap entry > > + * represents > > + * @nid: node id of the node the pool structure should be allocated on, > > + * or -1 > > + * > > + * Create a new special memory pool that can be used to manage special > > + * purpose memory not managed by the regular kmalloc/kfree interface. > > + * > > + * Return: > > + * * pointer to the pool - success > > + * * NULL - otherwise > > + */ > > If I'm not mistaken, several kernel-doc descriptions are duplicated now. > Can you please keep a single copy? ;-) I think the problem is that Igor has chosen to put the kernel-doc with the function declaration. I think we usually recommend putting it with the definition so it's more likely to be updated.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.