|
Message-ID: <abc02704-304e-2604-6297-75e6d2757c1e@linux.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 00:02:49 +0300 From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>, "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>, Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>, Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v9 4/7] x86/entry: Erase kernel stack in syscall_trace_enter() Hello Linus, Thanks for your reply (despite some strong words). On 05.03.2018 23:15, Linus Torvalds wrote: > This is the first I see of any of this, it was apparently not actually > posted to lkml or anything like that. I described that below. > Honestly, what I see just makes me go "this is security-masturbation". Let me quote the cover letter of this patch series. STACKLEAK (initially developed by PaX Team): - reduces the information that can be revealed through kernel stack leak bugs; - blocks some uninitialized stack variable attacks (e.g. CVE-2017-17712, CVE-2010-2963); - introduces some runtime checks for kernel stack overflow detection. It blocks the Stack Clash attack against the kernel. So it seems to be a useful feature. > It doesn't actually seem to help *find* bugs at all. As such, it's > another "paper over and forget" thing that just adds fairly high > overhead when it's enabled. The cover letter also contains the information about the performance impact. It's 0.6% on the compiling the kernel (with Ubuntu config) and approx 4% on a very intensive hackbench test. > I'm NAK'ing it sight-unseen (see above) just because I'm tired of > these kinds of pointless things that don't actually strive to improve > on the kernel, just add more and more overhead for nebulous "things > may happen", and that just make the code uglier. > > Why wasn't it even posted to lkml? That's my mistake. I started to learn that feature 9 month ago, just before Qualys published the Stack Clash attack (which is blocked by STACKLEAK). I sent first WIP versions to a short list of people (and had a lot of feedback to work with). But later unfortunately I didn't adjust the list of recipients. That was not done intentionally. > And why isn't the focus of security people on tools to _analyse_ and > find problems? You know, I like KASAN and kernel fuzzing as well: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=82f2341c94d270421f383641b7cd670e474db56b Best regards, Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.