|
Message-Id: <1519382538-15143-15-git-send-email-jinpu.wangl@profitbricks.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:42:03 +0100 From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...fitbricks.com> To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...ux.intel.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...fitbricks.com> Subject: [stable 4.4 14/29] x86/get_user: Use pointer masking to limit speculation From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> (cherry picked from commit c7f631cb07e7da06ac1d231ca178452339e32a94) Quoting Linus: I do think that it would be a good idea to very expressly document the fact that it's not that the user access itself is unsafe. I do agree that things like "get_user()" want to be protected, but not because of any direct bugs or problems with get_user() and friends, but simply because get_user() is an excellent source of a pointer that is obviously controlled from a potentially attacking user space. So it's a prime candidate for then finding _subsequent_ accesses that can then be used to perturb the cache. Unlike the __get_user() case get_user() includes the address limit check near the pointer de-reference. With that locality the speculation can be mitigated with pointer narrowing rather than a barrier, i.e. array_index_nospec(). Where the narrowing is performed by: cmp %limit, %ptr sbb %mask, %mask and %mask, %ptr With respect to speculation the value of %ptr is either less than %limit or NULL. Co-developed-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org Cc: alan@...ux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727417469.33451.11804043010080838495.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> [jwang: port to 4.4] Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...fitbricks.com> --- arch/x86/lib/getuser.S | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S b/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S index 46668cd..490b2ee 100644 --- a/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S +++ b/arch/x86/lib/getuser.S @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ ENTRY(__get_user_1) GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_DX) cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_DX),%_ASM_AX jae bad_get_user + sbb %_ASM_DX, %_ASM_DX /* array_index_mask_nospec() */ + and %_ASM_DX, %_ASM_AX ASM_STAC 1: movzbl (%_ASM_AX),%edx xor %eax,%eax @@ -51,6 +53,8 @@ ENTRY(__get_user_2) GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_DX) cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_DX),%_ASM_AX jae bad_get_user + sbb %_ASM_DX, %_ASM_DX /* array_index_mask_nospec() */ + and %_ASM_DX, %_ASM_AX ASM_STAC 2: movzwl -1(%_ASM_AX),%edx xor %eax,%eax @@ -64,6 +68,8 @@ ENTRY(__get_user_4) GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_DX) cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_DX),%_ASM_AX jae bad_get_user + sbb %_ASM_DX, %_ASM_DX /* array_index_mask_nospec() */ + and %_ASM_DX, %_ASM_AX ASM_STAC 3: movl -3(%_ASM_AX),%edx xor %eax,%eax @@ -78,6 +84,8 @@ ENTRY(__get_user_8) GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_DX) cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_DX),%_ASM_AX jae bad_get_user + sbb %_ASM_DX, %_ASM_DX /* array_index_mask_nospec() */ + and %_ASM_DX, %_ASM_AX ASM_STAC 4: movq -7(%_ASM_AX),%rdx xor %eax,%eax @@ -89,6 +97,8 @@ ENTRY(__get_user_8) GET_THREAD_INFO(%_ASM_DX) cmp TI_addr_limit(%_ASM_DX),%_ASM_AX jae bad_get_user_8 + sbb %_ASM_DX, %_ASM_DX /* array_index_mask_nospec() */ + and %_ASM_DX, %_ASM_AX ASM_STAC 4: movl -7(%_ASM_AX),%edx 5: movl -3(%_ASM_AX),%ecx -- 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.