|
Message-ID: <fdd74037-5b47-b4e1-e692-54534d518e88@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:38:48 -0800 From: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, richard.sandiford@....com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stackleak: Update for arm64 On 02/22/2018 08:58 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Laura, > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:13:02PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: >> >> arm64 has another layer of indirection in the RTL. >> Account for this in the plugin. >> >> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> >> --- >> scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c b/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c >> index 6fc991c98d8b..7dfaa027423f 100644 >> --- a/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c >> +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c >> @@ -244,6 +244,11 @@ static unsigned int stackleak_final_execute(void) >> * that insn. >> */ >> body = PATTERN(insn); >> + /* arm64 is different */ >> + if (GET_CODE(body) == PARALLEL) { >> + body = XEXP(body, 0); >> + body = XEXP(body, 0); >> + } > > Like most kernel developers, I don't know the first thing about GCC internals > so I asked our GCC team and Richard (CC'd) reckons this should be: > > if (GET_CODE(body) == PARALLEL) > body = XVECEXP(body, 0, 0); > > instead of the hunk above. Can you give that a go instead, please? > > Cheers, > > Will > Yep, seems to work fine and makes sense from my understanding of gcc internals. I'll fix it up for the next version. Thanks for the review! Laura
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.