|
Message-ID: <b75b5903-0177-8ad9-5c2b-fc63438fb5f2@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 21:57:13 +0200 From: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com> To: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Boris Lukashev <blukashev@...pervictus.com> CC: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, <jglisse@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Protectable Memory >> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> It's worth having a discussion about whether we want the pmalloc API >>> or whether we want a slab-based API. I'd love to have some feedback specifically about the API. I have also some idea about userspace and how to extend the pmalloc concept to it: http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2018/01/30/20 I'll be AFK intermittently for about 2 weeks, so i might not be able to reply immediately, but from my perspective this would be just the beginning of a broader hardening of both kernel and userspace that I'd like to pursue. -- igor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.