|
Message-ID: <20180121104019.GS17719@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 10:40:19 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, x86@...nel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...ux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.1 02/10] asm/nospec, array_ptr: sanitize speculative array de-references On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 01:06:09PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > +/* > + * If idx is negative or if idx > size then bit 63 is set in the mask, > + * and the value of ~(-1L) is zero. When the mask is zero, bounds check > + * failed, array_ptr will return NULL. The more times I see this the more times I'm unhappy with this comment: 1. does this really mean "idx > size" or "idx >= size" ? The code implements the latter not the former. 2. is "bit 63" relevant here - what if longs are 32-bit? "the top bit" or "the sign bit" would be better. 3. "and the value of ~(-1L) is zero." So does this mean that when 0 <= idx < size, somehow the rules of logic change and ~(-1L) magically becomes no longer zero! I'd suggest changing the description to something like: * If 0 <= idx < size, return a mask of ~0UL, otherwise return zero. or: * When idx is out of bounds (iow, is negative or idx >= sz), the sign * bit will be set. Extend the sign bit to all bits and invert, giving * a result of zero for an out of bounds idx, or ~0UL if within bounds. depending on how deeply you want to describe what's going on here. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.