[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801170843550.12151@nuc-kabylake>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 08:46:41 -0600 (CST)
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: kmem_cache_attr (was Re: [PATCH 04/36] usercopy: Prepare for
usercopy whitelisting)
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:17:01PM -0600, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > Draft patch of how the data structs could change. kmem_cache_attr is read
> > only.
>
> Looks good. Although I would add Kees' user feature:
Sure I tried to do this quickly so that the basic struct changes are
visible.
> And I'd start with
> +struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create_attr(const kmem_cache_attr *);
>
> leaving the old kmem_cache_create to kmalloc a kmem_cache_attr and
> initialise it.
Well at some point we should convert the callers by putting the
definitions into const kmem_cache_attr initializations. That way
the callbacks function pointers are safe.
> Can we also do something like this?
>
> -#define KMEM_CACHE(__struct, __flags) kmem_cache_create(#__struct,\
> - sizeof(struct __struct), __alignof__(struct __struct),\
> - (__flags), NULL)
> +#define KMEM_CACHE(__struct, __flags) ({ \
> + const struct kmem_cache_attr kca ## __stringify(__struct) = { \
> + .name = #__struct, \
> + .size = sizeof(struct __struct), \
> + .align = __alignof__(struct __struct), \
> + .flags = (__flags), \
> + }; \
> + kmem_cache_create_attr(&kca ## __stringify(__struct)); \
> +})
>
> That way we won't need to convert any of those users.
Yep thats what I was planning.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
