|
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g94iysWqz64KNk=HDdx6+b2e0O-rRrnFZDqfNSR3Xrjg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 20:30:17 -0800 From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] x86: use __uaccess_begin_nospec and ASM_IFENCE in get_user paths On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Linus Torvalds [..] > I'll respin this set along those lines, and drop the ifence bits. So now I'm not so sure. Yes, get_user_{1,2,4,8} can mask the pointer with the address limit result, but this doesn't work for the access_ok() + __get_user() case. We can either change the access_ok() calling convention to return a properly masked pointer to be used in subsequent calls to __get_user(), or go with lfence on every __get_user call. There seem to be several drivers that open code copy_from_user() with __get_user loops, so the 'fence every __get_user' approach might have noticeable overhead. On the other hand the access_ok conversion, while it could be scripted with coccinelle, is ~300 sites (VERIFY_READ), if you're concerned about having something small to merge for 4.15. I think the access_ok() conversion to return a speculation sanitized pointer or NULL is the way to go unless I'm missing something simpler. Other ideas?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.