|
Message-Id: <1515766769-9120-6-git-send-email-alex.popov@linux.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:19:28 +0300 From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>, x86@...nel.org, alex.popov@...ux.com Subject: [PATCH RFC v7 5/6] fs/proc: Show STACKLEAK metrics in the /proc file system Introduce CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS providing STACKLEAK information about tasks via the /proc file system. In particular, /proc/<pid>/stack_depth shows the maximum kernel stack consumption for the current and previous syscalls. Although this information is not precise, it can be useful for estimating the STACKLEAK performance impact for your workloads. Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com> --- arch/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++ arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 4 ++++ arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 4 ++++ arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 +++ arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 3 +++ arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 3 +++ arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 3 +++ fs/proc/base.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 50 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig index 6fcb632..0f5a59d 100644 --- a/arch/Kconfig +++ b/arch/Kconfig @@ -558,6 +558,18 @@ config STACKLEAK_TRACK_MIN_SIZE frame size greater than or equal to this parameter. If unsure, leave the default value 100. +config STACKLEAK_METRICS + bool "Show STACKLEAK metrics in the /proc file system" + depends on GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK + depends on PROC_FS + help + If this is set, STACKLEAK metrics for every task are available in + the /proc file system. In particular, /proc/<pid>/stack_depth + shows the maximum kernel stack consumption for the current and + previous syscalls. Although this information is not precise, it + can be useful for estimating the STACKLEAK performance impact for + your workloads. + config HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR bool help diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S index f400d8f..c22d190 100644 --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ ENTRY(erase_kstack) mov %esp, %ecx sub %edi, %ecx +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS + mov %edi, TASK_prev_lowest_stack(%ebp) +#endif + cmp $THREAD_SIZE_asm, %ecx jb 3f ud2 diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S index 3ff0802..40e4ba5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S @@ -118,6 +118,10 @@ ENTRY(erase_kstack) */ or $2 * 8, %rdi +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS + mov %rdi, TASK_prev_lowest_stack(%r11) +#endif + /* * Check whether we are on the thread stack to prepare the counter * for stack poisoning. diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h index 9736829..4741f26 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -498,6 +498,9 @@ struct thread_struct { #ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK unsigned long lowest_stack; +# ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS + unsigned long prev_lowest_stack; +# endif #endif unsigned int sig_on_uaccess_err:1; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c index ef5d260..f48197a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ void common(void) { OFFSET(TASK_addr_limit, task_struct, thread.addr_limit); #ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK OFFSET(TASK_lowest_stack, task_struct, thread.lowest_stack); +# ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS + OFFSET(TASK_prev_lowest_stack, task_struct, thread.prev_lowest_stack); +# endif #endif BLANK(); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c index 6d256ab..48993fe 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c @@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ int copy_thread_tls(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long sp, #ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK p->thread.lowest_stack = (unsigned long)task_stack_page(p) + 2 * sizeof(unsigned long); +# ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS + p->thread.prev_lowest_stack = p->thread.lowest_stack; +# endif #endif if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) { diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c index 4345fdf..faf9fae 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c @@ -284,6 +284,9 @@ int copy_thread_tls(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long sp, #ifdef CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK p->thread.lowest_stack = (unsigned long)task_stack_page(p) + 2 * sizeof(unsigned long); +# ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS + p->thread.prev_lowest_stack = p->thread.lowest_stack; +# endif #endif savesegment(gs, p->thread.gsindex); diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c index 60316b5..3106265 100644 --- a/fs/proc/base.c +++ b/fs/proc/base.c @@ -2884,6 +2884,21 @@ static int proc_pid_patch_state(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns, } #endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */ +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS +static int proc_stack_depth(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns, + struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task) +{ + unsigned long prev_depth = THREAD_SIZE - + (task->thread.prev_lowest_stack & (THREAD_SIZE - 1)); + unsigned long depth = THREAD_SIZE - + (task->thread.lowest_stack & (THREAD_SIZE - 1)); + + seq_printf(m, "previous stack depth: %lu\nstack depth: %lu\n", + prev_depth, depth); + return 0; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS */ + /* * Thread groups */ @@ -2988,6 +3003,9 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[] = { #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH ONE("patch_state", S_IRUSR, proc_pid_patch_state), #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS + ONE("stack_depth", S_IRUGO, proc_stack_depth), +#endif }; static int proc_tgid_base_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx) -- 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.