|
Message-Id: <20171128.041426.801732093971324601.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:14:26 +0900 (KST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org Cc: tixxdz@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org, luto@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mcgrof@...nel.org, james.l.morris@...cle.com, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, solar@...nwall.com, serge@...lyn.com, jeyu@...nel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, corbet@....net, mingo@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 next 0/5] Improve Module autoloading infrastructure From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:41:30 -0800 > What are the real life use-cases for normal users having modules > auto-load? User opens SCTP socket, SCTP protocol module loads. People build test cases via namespaces, and in that namespaces normal users can setup virtual tunnel devices themselves, and those configure operations can bring the tunnel module in.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.