|
Message-ID: <44203c85-f64f-4ae4-e179-28d50e11c82a@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:38:31 +0300 From: Pavel Vasilyev <dixlor@...il.com> To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Protected O_CREAT open in sticky directories 22.11.2017 16:22, Matthew Wilcox пишет: > > So you'd have the following meaningful values: > > 0 - permit all (your option 0) > 1 - notify world; permit group (your option 1) > 2 - block world; permit group > 3 - block,notify world; permit group > 4 - permit world; notify group (?) > 5 - notify world; notify group (your option 2) > 6 - block world; notify group (your option 3) > 7 - block,notify world; notify group > 8 - permit world; block group (?) > 9 - notify world; block group (?) > 10 - block world; block group (your option 4) > 11 - block,notify world; block group > 12 - permit world; block, notify group (?) > 13 - notify world; block, notify group (?) > 14 - block world; block, notify group > 15 - block, notify world; block, notify group > > Some of these don't make a lot of sense (marked with ?), but I don't see > the harm in permitting a sysadmin to do something that seems nonsensical > to me. > I think that notification in block mode by default.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.