|
Message-ID: <CACVxJT88zLoekiwFxq1rdDEnFxPnpZeDYHOWEVQEwHZvFdOy4A@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:26:30 +0200 From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> To: Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>, me@...in.cc, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, ebiederm@...ssion.com, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, bfields@...ldses.org, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, solar@...nwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/7] proc: add proc_fs_info struct to store proc information On 11/9/17, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com> wrote: > +struct proc_fs_info { > + struct pid_namespace *pid_ns; > +}; > +static inline struct proc_fs_info *proc_sb(struct super_block *sb) > +{ > + return sb->s_fs_info; > +} Can you rename this to "struct proc_super_block *" then? That "info" suffix all over filesystems doesn't add much info itself just more typing. Ditto for "fs_info" identifiers. > +extern inline struct proc_fs_info *proc_sb(struct super_block *sb) > { return NULL;} extern inline?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.