[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJvBKd2i-P4LVW_mHY9e3j4JEpaR4=a7dt3CcOvimcuTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:03:21 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com>, "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <wilal.deacon@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Chris Fries <cfries@...gle.com>, Dave Weinstein <olorin@...gle.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 0/2] printk: hash addresses printed with %p
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc> wrote:
> Here is the behaviour that this set implements.
>
> For kpt_restrict==0
>
> Randomness not ready:
> printed with %p: (pointer) # NOTE: with padding
> Valid pointer:
> printed with %pK: deadbeefdeadbeef
> printed with %p: 0xdeadbeef
> malformed specifier (eg %i): 0xdeadbeef
I really think we can't include SPECIAL unless _every_ callsite of %p
is actually doing "0x%p", and then we're replacing all of those. We're
not doing that, though...
$ git grep '%p\b' | wc -l
12766
$ git grep '0x%p\b' | wc -l
1837
If we need some kind of special marking that this is a hashed
variable, that should be something other than "0x". If we're using the
existing "(null)" and new "(pointer)" text, maybe "(hash:xxxxxx)"
should be used instead? Then the (rare) callers with 0x become
"0x(hash:xxxx)" and naked callers produce "(hash:xxxx)".
I think the first step for this is to just leave SPECIAL out.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
