|
Message-Id: <20171021133606.18866-1-nicolas@belouin.fr> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 15:36:06 +0200 From: Nicolas Belouin <nicolas@...ouin.fr> To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Cc: Nicolas Belouin <nicolas@...ouin.fr> Subject: [PATCH] fs: check for CAP_SYS_RESOURCE instead of CAP_SYS_ADMIN This check is meant to allow a privileged process to go above max_files, such a check must be done against CAP_SYS_RESOURCE as its role is to allow resources limits override. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Belouin <nicolas@...ouin.fr> --- fs/file_table.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/file_table.c b/fs/file_table.c index 61517f57f8ef..4bc74fd50838 100644 --- a/fs/file_table.c +++ b/fs/file_table.c @@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ struct file *get_empty_filp(void) /* * Privileged users can go above max_files */ - if (get_nr_files() >= files_stat.max_files && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) { + if (get_nr_files() >= files_stat.max_files && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) && + !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) { /* * percpu_counters are inaccurate. Do an expensive check before * we go and fail. -- 2.14.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.