|
Message-Id: <1505940337-79069-26-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:45:31 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: [PATCH v3 25/31] fork: Define usercopy region in thread_stack slab caches From: David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net> In support of usercopy hardening, this patch defines a region in the thread_stack slab caches in which userspace copy operations are allowed. Since the entire thread_stack needs to be available to userspace, the entire slab contents are whitelisted. Note that the slab-based thread stack is only present on systems with THREAD_SIZE < PAGE_SIZE and !CONFIG_VMAP_STACK. cache object allocation: kernel/fork.c: alloc_thread_stack_node(...): return kmem_cache_alloc_node(thread_stack_cache, ...) dup_task_struct(...): ... stack = alloc_thread_stack_node(...) ... tsk->stack = stack; copy_process(...): ... dup_task_struct(...) _do_fork(...): ... copy_process(...) This region is known as the slab cache's usercopy region. Slab caches can now check that each copy operation involving cache-managed memory falls entirely within the slab's usercopy region. This patch is modified from Brad Spengler/PaX Team's PAX_USERCOPY whitelisting code in the last public patch of grsecurity/PaX based on my understanding of the code. Changes or omissions from the original code are mine and don't reflect the original grsecurity/PaX code. Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dave@...lcore.net> [kees: adjust commit log, split patch, provide usage trace] Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> --- I wasn't able to test this, so anyone with a system that can try running with a large PAGE_SIZE and without VMAP_STACK would be appreciated. --- kernel/fork.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index dc1437f8b702..720109dc723a 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -278,8 +278,9 @@ static void free_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk) void thread_stack_cache_init(void) { - thread_stack_cache = kmem_cache_create("thread_stack", THREAD_SIZE, - THREAD_SIZE, 0, NULL); + thread_stack_cache = kmem_cache_create_usercopy("thread_stack", + THREAD_SIZE, THREAD_SIZE, 0, 0, + THREAD_SIZE, NULL); BUG_ON(thread_stack_cache == NULL); } # endif -- 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.