[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5877eed8-0e8e-0dec-fdc7-de01bdbdafa8@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:19:56 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Marco Benatto <marco.antonio.780@...il.com>,
Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@...onical.com>,
Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/10] swiotlb: Map the buffer if it was unmapped by
XPFO
On 08/09/2017 01:07 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
> @@ -420,8 +420,9 @@ static void swiotlb_bounce(phys_addr_t orig_addr, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
> {
> unsigned long pfn = PFN_DOWN(orig_addr);
> unsigned char *vaddr = phys_to_virt(tlb_addr);
> + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>
> - if (PageHighMem(pfn_to_page(pfn))) {
> + if (PageHighMem(page) || xpfo_page_is_unmapped(page)) {
> /* The buffer does not have a mapping. Map it in and copy */
> unsigned int offset = orig_addr & ~PAGE_MASK;
> char *buffer;
This is a little scary. I wonder how many more of these are in the
kernel, like:
> static inline void *skcipher_map(struct scatter_walk *walk)
> {
> struct page *page = scatterwalk_page(walk);
>
> return (PageHighMem(page) ? kmap_atomic(page) : page_address(page)) +
> offset_in_page(walk->offset);
> }
Is there any better way to catch these? Like, can we add some debugging
to check for XPFO pages in __va()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
