[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1503956551.2841.70.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 21:42:32 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"dave@...lcore.net" <dave@...lcore.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/30] scsi: Define usercopy region in scsi_sense_cache
slab cache
On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 14:34 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index f6097b89d5d3..f1c6bd56dd5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -77,14 +77,15 @@ int scsi_init_sense_cache(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
> if (shost->unchecked_isa_dma) {
> scsi_sense_isadma_cache =
> kmem_cache_create("scsi_sense_cache(DMA)",
> - SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, 0,
> - SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_CACHE_DMA, NULL);
> + SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, 0,
> + SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN | SLAB_CACHE_DMA, NULL);
> if (!scsi_sense_isadma_cache)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
All this part of this patch does is to change source code indentation. Should
these changes really be included in this patch?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
