[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170824022853.qbgiubmslaaeclxf@ast-mbp>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 19:28:55 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 03/10] bpf,landlock: Define an eBPF program
type for a Landlock rule
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 02:09:26AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> Add a new type of eBPF program used by Landlock rules.
>
> This new BPF program type will be registered with the Landlock LSM
> initialization.
>
> Add an initial Landlock Kconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v6:
> * add 3 more sub-events: IOCTL, LOCK, FCNTL
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2fbc99a6-f190-f335-bd14-04bdeed35571@digikod.net
> * rename LANDLOCK_VERSION to LANDLOCK_ABI to better reflect its purpose,
> and move it from landlock.h to common.h
> * rename BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK to BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK_RULE: an eBPF
> program could be used for something else than a rule
> * simplify struct landlock_context by removing the arch and syscall_nr fields
> * remove all eBPF map functions call, remove ABILITY_WRITE
> * refactor bpf_landlock_func_proto() (suggested by Kees Cook)
> * constify pointers
> * fix doc inclusion
>
> Changes since v5:
> * rename file hooks.c to init.c
> * fix spelling
>
> Changes since v4:
> * merge a minimal (not enabled) LSM code and Kconfig in this commit
>
> Changes since v3:
> * split commit
> * revamp the landlock_context:
> * add arch, syscall_nr and syscall_cmd (ioctl, fcntl…) to be able to
> cross-check action with the event type
> * replace args array with dedicated fields to ease the addition of new
> fields
> ---
> include/linux/bpf_types.h | 3 ++
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> security/Kconfig | 1 +
> security/Makefile | 2 +
> security/landlock/Kconfig | 18 ++++++++
> security/landlock/Makefile | 3 ++
> security/landlock/common.h | 21 +++++++++
> security/landlock/init.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 9 files changed, 340 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 security/landlock/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 security/landlock/Makefile
> create mode 100644 security/landlock/common.h
> create mode 100644 security/landlock/init.c
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_types.h b/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> index 6f1a567667b8..8bac93970a47 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE, kprobe_prog_ops)
> BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, tracepoint_prog_ops)
> BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, perf_event_prog_ops)
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_LANDLOCK
> +BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK_RULE, bpf_landlock_ops)
> +#endif
>
> BPF_MAP_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, array_map_ops)
> BPF_MAP_TYPE(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY, percpu_array_map_ops)
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 8541ab85e432..20da634da941 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS,
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
> + BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK_RULE,
> };
>
> enum bpf_attach_type {
> @@ -879,4 +880,100 @@ enum {
> #define TCP_BPF_IW 1001 /* Set TCP initial congestion window */
> #define TCP_BPF_SNDCWND_CLAMP 1002 /* Set sndcwnd_clamp */
>
> +/**
> + * enum landlock_subtype_event - event occurring when an action is performed on
> + * a particular kernel object
> + *
> + * An event is a policy decision point which exposes the same context type
> + * (especially the same arg[0-9] field types) for each rule execution.
> + *
> + * @LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_UNSPEC: invalid value
> + * @LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS: generic filesystem event
> + * @LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_IOCTL: custom IOCTL sub-event
> + * @LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_LOCK: custom LOCK sub-event
> + * @LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_FCNTL: custom FCNTL sub-event
> + */
> +enum landlock_subtype_event {
> + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_UNSPEC,
> + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS,
> + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_IOCTL,
> + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_LOCK,
> + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_FCNTL,
> +};
> +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_LAST LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_EVENT_FS_FCNTL
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: landlock_subtype_ability
> + *
> + * eBPF context and functions allowed for a rule
> + *
> + * - LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_DEBUG: allows to do debug actions (e.g. writing
> + * logs), which may be dangerous and should only be used for rule testing
> + */
> +#define LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_DEBUG (1ULL << 0)
> +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_NB 1
> +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_MASK ((1ULL << _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_NB) - 1)
can you move the last two macros out of uapi?
There is really no need for the implementation details to
leak into uapi.
> +
> +/*
> + * Future options for a Landlock rule (e.g. run even if a previous rule denied
> + * an action).
> + */
> +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_OPTION_NB 0
> +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_OPTION_MASK ((1ULL << _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_OPTION_NB) - 1)
same here
> +
> +/*
> + * Status visible in the @status field of a context (e.g. already called in
> + * this syscall session, with same args...).
> + *
> + * The @status field exposed to a rule shall depend on the rule version.
> + */
> +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_STATUS_NB 0
> +#define _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_STATUS_MASK ((1ULL << _LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_STATUS_NB) - 1)
and here
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: landlock_action_fs
> + *
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_EXEC: execute a file or walk through a directory
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_WRITE: modify a file or a directory view (which
> + * include mount actions)
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_READ: read a file or a directory
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_NEW: create a file or a directory
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_GET: open or receive a file
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_REMOVE: unlink a file or remove a directory
> + *
> + * Each of the following actions are specific to syscall multiplexers. Each of
> + * them trigger a dedicated Landlock event where their command can be read.
> + *
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_IOCTL: ioctl command
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_LOCK: flock or fcntl lock command
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_FCNTL: fcntl command
> + */
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_EXEC (1ULL << 0)
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_WRITE (1ULL << 1)
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_READ (1ULL << 2)
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_NEW (1ULL << 3)
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_GET (1ULL << 4)
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_REMOVE (1ULL << 5)
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_IOCTL (1ULL << 6)
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_LOCK (1ULL << 7)
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_FCNTL (1ULL << 8)
> +#define _LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_NB 9
> +#define _LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_MASK ((1ULL << _LANDLOCK_ACTION_FS_NB) - 1)
and here
> +
> +
> +/**
> + * struct landlock_context - context accessible to a Landlock rule
> + *
> + * @status: bitfield for future use (LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_STATUS_*)
> + * @event: event type (&enum landlock_subtype_event)
> + * @arg1: event's first optional argument
> + * @arg2: event's second optional argument
> + */
> +struct landlock_context {
> + __u64 status;
> + __u64 event;
> + __u64 arg1;
> + __u64 arg2;
> +};
looking at all the uapi additions.. probably worth moving them
into separate .h like we did with bpf_perf_event.h
How about include/uapi/linux/landlock.h ?
It can include bpf.h first thing and then the rest of
landlock related bits.
so all, but BPF_PROG_TYPE_LANDLOCK_RULE will go there.
> +++ b/security/landlock/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +config SECURITY_LANDLOCK
> + bool "Landlock sandbox support"
> + depends on SECURITY
> + depends on BPF_SYSCALL
> + depends on SECCOMP_FILTER
> + default y
all new features need to start with default n
> +static inline const struct bpf_func_proto *bpf_landlock_func_proto(
> + enum bpf_func_id func_id,
> + const union bpf_prog_subtype *prog_subtype)
> +{
> + /* generic functions */
> + if (prog_subtype->landlock_rule.ability &
> + LANDLOCK_SUBTYPE_ABILITY_DEBUG) {
> + switch (func_id) {
> + case BPF_FUNC_get_current_comm:
> + return &bpf_get_current_comm_proto;
> + case BPF_FUNC_get_current_pid_tgid:
> + return &bpf_get_current_pid_tgid_proto;
> + case BPF_FUNC_get_current_uid_gid:
> + return &bpf_get_current_uid_gid_proto;
why current_*() helpers are 'debug' only?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
