[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170815034718.o6fej2gqkmypxtl2@smitten>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:47:18 -0600
From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ker.com>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Marco Benatto <marco.antonio.780@...il.com>,
Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@...onical.com>,
Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame
Ownership (XPFO)
Hi Laura,
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 03:30:00PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 08/09/2017 01:07 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > +/* Update a single kernel page table entry */
> > +inline void set_kpte(void *kaddr, struct page *page, pgprot_t prot)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int level;
> > + pgprot_t msk_clr;
> > + pte_t *pte = lookup_address((unsigned long)kaddr, &level);
> > +
> > + BUG_ON(!pte);
> > +
> > + switch (level) {
> > + case PG_LEVEL_4K:
> > + set_pte_atomic(pte, pfn_pte(page_to_pfn(page), canon_pgprot(prot)));
> > + break;
> > + case PG_LEVEL_2M:
> > + /* We need to check if it's a 2M page or 1GB page before retrieve
> > + * pgprot info, as each one will be extracted from a different
> > + * page table levels */
> > + msk_clr = pmd_pgprot(*(pmd_t*)pte);
> > + case PG_LEVEL_1G: {
> > + struct cpa_data cpa;
> > + int do_split;
> > +
> > + msk_clr = pud_pgprot(*(pud_t*)pte);
> > +
> > + memset(&cpa, 0, sizeof(cpa));
> > + cpa.vaddr = kaddr;
> > + cpa.pages = &page;
> > + cpa.mask_set = prot;
> > + cpa.mask_clr = msk_clr;
> > + cpa.numpages = 1;
> > + cpa.flags = 0;
> > + cpa.curpage = 0;
> > + cpa.force_split = 0;
> > +
> > +
> > + do_split = try_preserve_large_page(pte, (unsigned long)kaddr, &cpa);
> > + if (do_split) {
> > + spin_lock(&cpa_lock);
> > + BUG_ON(split_large_page(&cpa, pte, (unsigned long)kaddr));
> > + spin_unlock(&cpa_lock);
> > + }
>
> This doesn't work in atomic contexts:
>
> [ 28.263571] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> mm/page_alloc.c:4048
> [ 28.263575] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 2433, name:
> gnome-terminal
> [ 28.263576] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
> [ 28.263578] irq event stamp: 0
> [ 28.263580] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [< (null)>]
> (null)
> [ 28.263584] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff840af28a>]
> copy_process.part.25+0x62a/0x1e90
> [ 28.263587] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff840af28a>]
> copy_process.part.25+0x62a/0x1e90
> [ 28.263588] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>]
> (null)
> [ 28.263591] CPU: 0 PID: 2433 Comm: gnome-terminal Tainted: G W
> 4.13.0-rc5-xpfo+ #86
> [ 28.263592] Hardware name: LENOVO 20BTS1N700/20BTS1N700, BIOS N14ET28W
> (1.06 ) 03/12/2015
> [ 28.263593] Call Trace:
> [ 28.263598] dump_stack+0x8e/0xd6
> [ 28.263601] ___might_sleep+0x164/0x250
> [ 28.263604] __might_sleep+0x4a/0x80
> [ 28.263607] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2b3/0x3e0
> [ 28.263611] alloc_pages_current+0x6a/0xe0
> [ 28.263614] split_large_page+0x4e/0x360
> [ 28.263618] set_kpte+0x12c/0x150
> [ 28.263623] xpfo_kunmap+0x7e/0xa0
> [ 28.263627] wp_page_copy+0x16e/0x800
> [ 28.263631] do_wp_page+0x9a/0x580
> [ 28.263633] __handle_mm_fault+0xb1c/0x1130
> [ 28.263638] handle_mm_fault+0x178/0x350
> [ 28.263641] __do_page_fault+0x26e/0x510
> [ 28.263644] do_page_fault+0x30/0x80
> [ 28.263647] page_fault+0x28/0x30
>
>
> split_large_page calls alloc_page with GFP_KERNEL. switching to
> use GFP_ATOMIC in this path works locally for me.
Oof, thanks. I'll do that for the next version, and also CC x86 in
case they may have better suggestions.
Cheers,
Tycho
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
